The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery

The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a tool used to measure the robustness of statistically non-significant outcomes by quantifying the minimum event changes required to achieve significance. This study applies the RFI and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) to hand surgery randomized control trials (RCTs). A systematic review of 15 journals yielded 25 RCTs with 43 non-significant, dichotomous outcomes published from 2000 to 2024. The RFI was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the RFQ was calculated by dividing the RFI by the sample size. The median RFI was 4 and the median RFQ was 0.056. Loss to follow-up was not clearly reported in 24% of studies and loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI in 56% of outcomes. Hand surgery RCTs demonstrate fragility in non-significant findings, with a small number of event changes potentially altering conclusions. The RFI and RFQ are useful measures that complement traditional <i>p</i>-values, offering more context in interpreting clinical trial results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251327880
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery

Trista M. Benítez, Kevin C. Chung, Rodney Ahdoot, Chien-Wei Wang et al.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery

Trista M. Benítez, Kevin C. Chung, Rodney Ahdoot, Chien-Wei Wang, Bhuvan Pottepalem
article en

Abstract

The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a tool used to measure the robustness of statistically non-significant outcomes by quantifying the minimum event changes required to achieve significance. This study applies the RFI and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) to hand surgery randomized control trials (RCTs). A systematic review of 15 journals yielded 25 RCTs with 43 non-significant, dichotomous outcomes published from 2000 to 2024. The RFI was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the RFQ was calculated by dividing the RFI by the sample size. The median RFI was 4 and the median RFQ was 0.056. Loss to follow-up was not clearly reported in 24% of studies and loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI in 56% of outcomes. Hand surgery RCTs demonstrate fragility in non-significant findings, with a small number of event changes potentially altering conclusions. The RFI and RFQ are useful measures that complement traditional <i>p</i>-values, offering more context in interpreting clinical trial results.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)Vol. 50(9)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.