Formulation of High Internal Phase Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Pomelo Peel-Derived Cellulose Nanofibrils and Pea Protein Isolate as Pork Fat Substitutes in Meat Patties
This study investigates the application of high internal phase Pickering emulsions stabilized by pomelo peel-derived cellulose nanofibrils and pea protein isolate as sustainable alternatives to pork fat in meat patties. The emulsions, optimized with 0.7% cellulose nanofibrils and 0.4% pea protein isolate, exhibited exceptional stability due to a strong three-dimensional network, enhancing viscoelastic properties. Incorporating these emulsions into meat patties significantly enhanced cooking yield (from 61.42% to 77.10%), water and oil retention, and textural characteristics as substitution levels increased. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed the development of a cohesive fat-protein matrix, contributing to enhanced structural integrity and favorable textural characteristics. Furthermore, in vitro digestion demonstrated that these emulsions as fat substitutes enhanced digestibility (64.85% to 83.57%) and reduced lipid oxidation (TBARS values from 0.55 to 0.19 mg/kg). These findings highlight the potential of cellulose nanofibrils and pea protein-stabilized Pickering emulsions as innovative and sustainable fat substitutes for processed meat products.
Authors
- Qiaomei Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7180-2321)
- Jianbiao Gao
- Jinglin Yu
- Qingbin Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2049-5771)
- Wenxin Dai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-6072)
- Xuanbo Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-6606)
- Yijun Pan
- Yu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-5834)
- Huanhuan Liu
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Virginia Tech (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ACS Food Science & Technology
- Published
- 2025-03-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.5c00076
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.32