Sustainable Poverty Reduction through Social Assistance: Modality, Context, and Complementary Programming in Bangladesh

Social assistance programs can increase consumption and reduce poverty, but less is known about whether these impacts are sustained after programs end or how design and context influence sustainability. Using data collected in two regions of Bangladesh four years after a randomized intervention ended, we find that combining cash transfers with complementary programming led to sustained increases in consumption and reductions in poverty. Combining food transfers with complementary programming showed similar patterns to a lesser extent. Cash alone had context-specific sustained effects; food alone had no sustained impacts. Results suggest that context, modality, and complementary programming matter for sustained impacts. (JEL D12, E21, I32, I38, O15)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Applied Economics
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20230108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Poverty Reduction through Social Assistance: Modality, Context, and Complementary Programming in Bangladesh

Shalini Roy, Bastien Kolt, Mélissa Hidrobo, John Hoddinott et al.
2 citations
American Economic Journal Applied Economics
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
4.73
article

Sustainable Poverty Reduction through Social Assistance: Modality, Context, and Complementary Programming in Bangladesh

Shalini Roy, Bastien Kolt, Mélissa Hidrobo, John Hoddinott, Salauddin Tauseef, Akhter Ahmed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social assistance programs can increase consumption and reduce poverty, but less is known about whether these impacts are sustained after programs end or how design and context influence sustainability. Using data collected in two regions of Bangladesh four years after a randomized intervention ended, we find that combining cash transfers with complementary programming led to sustained increases in consumption and reductions in poverty. Combining food transfers with complementary programming showed similar patterns to a lesser extent. Cash alone had context-specific sustained effects; food alone had no sustained impacts. Results suggest that context, modality, and complementary programming matter for sustained impacts. (JEL D12, E21, I32, I38, O15)

American Economic Journal Applied EconomicsVol. 17(2)
International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.