Postoperative Recovery Time After Knee Arthroscopic Surgery Using Low Dose Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

General anesthesia (GA) is the preferred technique in ambulatory surgery because GA is associated with a predictable recovery time. However, it carries higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and drowsiness when compared with spinal anesthesia (SA). This study aimed to determine whether the recovery time in mepivacaine of 30 mg SA is noninferior when compared with GA. Our single-center retrospective study used a multivariable logistic regression to model anesthetic modality as a function of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. After screening 455 patients, 111 patients in each group were matched. SA was associated with 23.0 minutes (95% CI, -∞ to 31.0; <i>P</i> < .0001) longer recovery time, shorter operating room time (-8.0 minutes, 95% CI -13.0 to -3.0), more likely to bypass phase 1 recovery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.88) and less opioid use (-0.5 mg; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.0001) but no difference in length of stay (LOS). Spinal anesthesia was correlated with inferior recovery time. The associated phase 1 bypass and similar LOS suggest SA as a viable alternative to GA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AANA journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70278/aanaj/.0000001011
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Recovery Time After Knee Arthroscopic Surgery Using Low Dose Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

Kamal Kumar, Rohan Dadak, Cheng Lin, Hesham Youssef et al.
AANA journal
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Postoperative Recovery Time After Knee Arthroscopic Surgery Using Low Dose Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

Kamal Kumar, Rohan Dadak, Cheng Lin, Hesham Youssef, Grace Xu
article en

Abstract

General anesthesia (GA) is the preferred technique in ambulatory surgery because GA is associated with a predictable recovery time. However, it carries higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and drowsiness when compared with spinal anesthesia (SA). This study aimed to determine whether the recovery time in mepivacaine of 30 mg SA is noninferior when compared with GA. Our single-center retrospective study used a multivariable logistic regression to model anesthetic modality as a function of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. After screening 455 patients, 111 patients in each group were matched. SA was associated with 23.0 minutes (95% CI, -∞ to 31.0; <i>P</i> < .0001) longer recovery time, shorter operating room time (-8.0 minutes, 95% CI -13.0 to -3.0), more likely to bypass phase 1 recovery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.88) and less opioid use (-0.5 mg; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.0001) but no difference in length of stay (LOS). Spinal anesthesia was correlated with inferior recovery time. The associated phase 1 bypass and similar LOS suggest SA as a viable alternative to GA.

AANA journalVol. 93(2)
Western University (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Victoria Hospital (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.