Evaluation of Research Productivity Among Academic Oculoplastic Surgeons Using the Relative Citation Ratio
Current academic oculoplastic surgeons have comparable mRCR values relative to the National Institutes of Health-standard RCR value of 1. These benchmark data serve as a more accurate gauge of research impact within the oculoplastic surgery community and can be used to inform self, institutional, and departmental evaluations. In addition, the mRCR may provide an accurate metric for quantifying research productivity among historically underrepresented groups that are disadvantaged by time-dependent factors such as the number of publications.
Authors
- Catherine J. Hwang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-5130)
- Lucy S. Guan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-6898)
- Matthew Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-3765)
- Julian D. Perry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-0649)
- Oliver Guyer
Institutions
- Johnson University (US)
- Cleveland Eye Clinic (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2025-03-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000002940
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00