Impact of shared decision‐making in onychomycosis treatment: A cross‐sectional study based on the Illuminating Dialogues and Insights in Onychomycosis Management (IDIOM) survey

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail characterized by deformity and discoloration. Besides aesthetic concerns, it can impair patients' quality of life and increase the risk of secondary bacterial infections as well as the spread of fungal infections to other body sites and other individuals, making it a potential public health concern. Treatment options include oral and topical medications, the latter often requiring long-term therapy. While oral antifungal agents demonstrate high efficacy against onychomycosis, concerns about side effects and drug-drug interactions may act as barriers to their selection. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process in which patients and physicians share information based on scientific evidence and make decisions together taking into account the patient's values and preferences. While SDM has been reported to be beneficial across various disease areas, its utility in the treatment of onychomycosis remains insufficiently explored. In this study, we conducted an online survey of patients with onychomycosis to cross-sectionally compare the level of SDM implementation with patient concerns about oral medications, treatment satisfaction, perceived treatment efficacy, and treatment-switching behaviors. The percentage of patients with strong concerns about the side effects and drug-drug interactions of oral medications was significantly lower in the high SDM implementation group (21.7% and 13.0%, respectively) than in the low SDM implementation group (46.1% and 39.5%, respectively). Furthermore, the high SDM implementation group reported significantly higher treatment satisfaction than that reported by the low SDM implementation group, regardless of whether oral or topical treatment was used. These findings underscore the importance of SDM in the treatment of onychomycosis and suggest that dermatologists should actively consider implementing SDM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Dermatology
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.17716
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of shared decision‐making in onychomycosis treatment: A cross‐sectional study based on the Illuminating Dialogues and Insights in Onychomycosis Management (IDIOM) survey

Atsushi Otsuka, Yuichiro Tsunemi, Yusuke Nonaka
2 citations
The Journal of Dermatology
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
article

Impact of shared decision‐making in onychomycosis treatment: A cross‐sectional study based on the Illuminating Dialogues and Insights in Onychomycosis Management (IDIOM) survey

Atsushi Otsuka, Yuichiro Tsunemi, Yusuke Nonaka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail characterized by deformity and discoloration. Besides aesthetic concerns, it can impair patients' quality of life and increase the risk of secondary bacterial infections as well as the spread of fungal infections to other body sites and other individuals, making it a potential public health concern. Treatment options include oral and topical medications, the latter often requiring long-term therapy. While oral antifungal agents demonstrate high efficacy against onychomycosis, concerns about side effects and drug-drug interactions may act as barriers to their selection. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process in which patients and physicians share information based on scientific evidence and make decisions together taking into account the patient's values and preferences. While SDM has been reported to be beneficial across various disease areas, its utility in the treatment of onychomycosis remains insufficiently explored. In this study, we conducted an online survey of patients with onychomycosis to cross-sectionally compare the level of SDM implementation with patient concerns about oral medications, treatment satisfaction, perceived treatment efficacy, and treatment-switching behaviors. The percentage of patients with strong concerns about the side effects and drug-drug interactions of oral medications was significantly lower in the high SDM implementation group (21.7% and 13.0%, respectively) than in the low SDM implementation group (46.1% and 39.5%, respectively). Furthermore, the high SDM implementation group reported significantly higher treatment satisfaction than that reported by the low SDM implementation group, regardless of whether oral or topical treatment was used. These findings underscore the importance of SDM in the treatment of onychomycosis and suggest that dermatologists should actively consider implementing SDM.

The Journal of DermatologyVol. 52(6)
Saitama Medical University (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Eisai
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.