Energy landscapes direct the movement preferences of elephants

The movements of animals affect biodiversity, ecological processes, and the resilience of an ecosystem. Movements carry both costs and benefits, and the use of a given landscape provides important insights into an animal's behavioural ecology and decision processes, as well as elucidating ecosystem complexity and informing conservation measures that are ever more important in the age of rapid global changes. The mobility and habitat preferences of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) offer a good example to explore the concept of 'energy landscapes', that is, the interplay between the cost of locomotion and vegetation productivity, balanced by topography, availability of water and human presence and pressures. Our results, building on tracking data from 157 individuals collected between 1998 and 2020 in Northern Kenya, show that energy landscapes explained the elephants' usage of the landscape. In particular, we found that individuals generally avoided energetically costly areas and preferred highly productive habitats. We also found that water availability is important in determining habitat usage, but that its effect varied greatly among elephants, with some individuals preferring habitats avoided by others. Our analysis highlights the importance of the energy landscape as a key driver of habitat preferences of elephants. Energy landscapes rely on fundamental biomechanical and physical principles and provide a mechanistic understanding of the observed preference patterns, allowing us to disentangle key causal drivers of an animal's preferences from correlational effects. This, in turn, has important implications for assessing and planning conservation and restoration measures, such as dispersal corridors, by explicitly accounting for the energy costs of moving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70023
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy landscapes direct the movement preferences of elephants

Fritz Vollrath, Benjamin Rosenbaum, Emilio Berti
9 citations
Journal of Animal Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
15.45
article

Energy landscapes direct the movement preferences of elephants

Fritz Vollrath, Benjamin Rosenbaum, Emilio Berti
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The movements of animals affect biodiversity, ecological processes, and the resilience of an ecosystem. Movements carry both costs and benefits, and the use of a given landscape provides important insights into an animal's behavioural ecology and decision processes, as well as elucidating ecosystem complexity and informing conservation measures that are ever more important in the age of rapid global changes. The mobility and habitat preferences of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) offer a good example to explore the concept of 'energy landscapes', that is, the interplay between the cost of locomotion and vegetation productivity, balanced by topography, availability of water and human presence and pressures. Our results, building on tracking data from 157 individuals collected between 1998 and 2020 in Northern Kenya, show that energy landscapes explained the elephants' usage of the landscape. In particular, we found that individuals generally avoided energetically costly areas and preferred highly productive habitats. We also found that water availability is important in determining habitat usage, but that its effect varied greatly among elephants, with some individuals preferring habitats avoided by others. Our analysis highlights the importance of the energy landscape as a key driver of habitat preferences of elephants. Energy landscapes rely on fundamental biomechanical and physical principles and provide a mechanistic understanding of the observed preference patterns, allowing us to disentangle key causal drivers of an animal's preferences from correlational effects. This, in turn, has important implications for assessing and planning conservation and restoration measures, such as dispersal corridors, by explicitly accounting for the energy costs of moving.

Journal of Animal EcologyVol. 94(5)
Save the Elephants (KE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.