How some tropical trees benefit from being struck by lightning: evidence for <i>Dipteryx oleifera</i> and other large‐statured trees

Lightning strikes kill hundreds of millions of trees annually, but their role in shaping tree life history and diversity is largely unknown. Here, we use data from a unique lightning location system to show that some individual trees counterintuitively benefit from being struck by lightning. Lightning killed 56% of 93 directly struck trees and caused an average of 41% crown dieback among the survivors. However, among these struck trees, 10 direct strikes caused negligible damage to Dipteryx oleifera trees while killing 78% of their lianas and 2.1 Mg of competitor tree biomass. Nine trees of other long-lived taxa survived lightning with similar benefits. On average, a D. oleifera tree > 60 cm in diameter is struck by lightning at least five times during its lifetime, conferring these benefits repeatedly. We estimate that the ability to survive lightning increases lifetime fecundity 14-fold, largely because of reduced competition from lianas and neighboring trees. Moreover, the unusual heights and wide crowns of D. oleifera increase the probability of a direct strike by 49-68% relative to trees of the same diameter with average allometries. These patterns suggest that lightning plays an underappreciated role in tree competition, life history strategies, and species coexistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70062
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How some tropical trees benefit from being struck by lightning: evidence for Dipteryx oleifera and other large‐statured trees

Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Jeffrey C. Burchfield, Phillip M. Bitzer, K. C. Cushman et al.
4 citations
New Phytologist
Forest ecology and management
9.25
article

How some tropical trees benefit from being struck by lightning: evidence for Dipteryx oleifera and other large‐statured trees

Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Jeffrey C. Burchfield, Phillip M. Bitzer, K. C. Cushman, Stephen P. Yanoviak, Evan M. Gora, Jeannine H. Richards, J. Pablo Narvaez
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Lightning strikes kill hundreds of millions of trees annually, but their role in shaping tree life history and diversity is largely unknown. Here, we use data from a unique lightning location system to show that some individual trees counterintuitively benefit from being struck by lightning. Lightning killed 56% of 93 directly struck trees and caused an average of 41% crown dieback among the survivors. However, among these struck trees, 10 direct strikes caused negligible damage to Dipteryx oleifera trees while killing 78% of their lianas and 2.1 Mg of competitor tree biomass. Nine trees of other long-lived taxa survived lightning with similar benefits. On average, a D. oleifera tree > 60 cm in diameter is struck by lightning at least five times during its lifetime, conferring these benefits repeatedly. We estimate that the ability to survive lightning increases lifetime fecundity 14-fold, largely because of reduced competition from lianas and neighboring trees. Moreover, the unusual heights and wide crowns of D. oleifera increase the probability of a direct strike by 49-68% relative to trees of the same diameter with average allometries. These patterns suggest that lightning plays an underappreciated role in tree competition, life history strategies, and species coexistence.

New PhytologistVol. 246(4)
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Louisville (US), Florida Gulf Coast University (US), Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US), University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
National Geographic Society, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Division of Environmental Biology
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forest ecology and management
9.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.