Assessment of Therapeutic Approaches: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections and the Choice Between Vancomycin + Clindamycin and Linezolid

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life threatening, requiring antibiotic agents and surgical intervention. Clindamycin or linezolid is recommended as an adjunct therapy for toxin mediation; however, limited data are comparing clindamycin-based to linezolid-based regimens in NSTI. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective study included adults with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University of Kentucky HealthCare for surgical debridement between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotic agents for <24 hours, underwent surgical debridement at an outside hospital, or were readmitted within the study period. The primary outcome was the number of debridements before source control. Secondary outcomes included time to source control, acute kidney injury (AKI) rates, ICU length of stay, and antibiotic duration. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 242 patients were included with 199 receiving clindamycin and 43 receiving linezolid. There was no difference observed in the number of surgical debridements between the clindamycin and linezolid cohorts ([2.0 (2, 4) vs. 3.0 (2, 4)]; p = 0.219). The multi-variable regression identified independent parameters that predicted a significant increase in number of debridements included sequential organ failure assessment score (1.03 [1.003, 1.047]; p = 0.028), culture(s) positive for <i>Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus</i>, or <i>Streptococcus intermedius</i> (1.309 [1.042, 1.629]; p = 0.018), and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp. (1.301 [1.048, 1.602]; p = 0.015). No differences were observed in AKI ([53.8% vs. 60.8%], p = 0.424), ICU stay ([5.3 vs. 6.1 d]; p = 0.399), or antibiotic duration between vancomycin, clindamycin, and linezolid ([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d]; p = 0.683), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Linezolid resulted in a similar number of surgical debridements compared with clindamycin in NSTI patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Infections
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Therapeutic Approaches: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections and the Choice Between Vancomycin + Clindamycin and Linezolid

Katie B. Olney, Caroline Bradley, Ioanna Nixon, William J. Olney et al.
1 citations
Surgical Infections
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
1.40
article

Assessment of Therapeutic Approaches: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections and the Choice Between Vancomycin + Clindamycin and Linezolid

Katie B. Olney, Caroline Bradley, Ioanna Nixon, William J. Olney, Dina Ali, Aric D. Schadler, Jacqueline M. Bishop, Zachary Warriner, Alexandra Wiegand, A. Leonhard, Jeremy VanHoose, Sara E. Parli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life threatening, requiring antibiotic agents and surgical intervention. Clindamycin or linezolid is recommended as an adjunct therapy for toxin mediation; however, limited data are comparing clindamycin-based to linezolid-based regimens in NSTI. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective study included adults with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University of Kentucky HealthCare for surgical debridement between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotic agents for <24 hours, underwent surgical debridement at an outside hospital, or were readmitted within the study period. The primary outcome was the number of debridements before source control. Secondary outcomes included time to source control, acute kidney injury (AKI) rates, ICU length of stay, and antibiotic duration. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 242 patients were included with 199 receiving clindamycin and 43 receiving linezolid. There was no difference observed in the number of surgical debridements between the clindamycin and linezolid cohorts ([2.0 (2, 4) vs. 3.0 (2, 4)]; p = 0.219). The multi-variable regression identified independent parameters that predicted a significant increase in number of debridements included sequential organ failure assessment score (1.03 [1.003, 1.047]; p = 0.028), culture(s) positive for <i>Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus</i>, or <i>Streptococcus intermedius</i> (1.309 [1.042, 1.629]; p = 0.018), and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp. (1.301 [1.048, 1.602]; p = 0.015). No differences were observed in AKI ([53.8% vs. 60.8%], p = 0.424), ICU stay ([5.3 vs. 6.1 d]; p = 0.399), or antibiotic duration between vancomycin, clindamycin, and linezolid ([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d]; p = 0.683), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Linezolid resulted in a similar number of surgical debridements compared with clindamycin in NSTI patients.

Surgical InfectionsVol. 26(7)
University of Kentucky HealthCare (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.