Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets

Achieving the Paris Agreement's CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction goals heavily relies on enhancing carbon storage and sequestration in forests globally. Yet, the increasing vulnerability of carbon stored in forests to both climate change and human intervention is often neglected in current mitigation strategies. Our study explores modelled interactions between key emission sectors, indicating that accelerated decarbonization could meet climate objectives despite forest carbon losses due to disturbances. However, delaying action on forest carbon loss by just five years consistently doubles the additional mitigation costs and efforts across key sectors, regardless of the assessed forest disturbance rates. Moreover, these myopic responses to forest carbon loss are as stringent, or even more demanding, than immediate responses to twice the forest disturbance rate. Our results underline the urgent need to monitor and safeguard forests for the economic feasibility of the Paris Agreement's climate goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets

Gunnar Luderer, Leon Merfort, Gabriel Medeiros Abrahão, Jens Heinke et al.
6 citations
Nature Communications
Climate Change Policy and Economics
18.79
article

Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets

Gunnar Luderer, Leon Merfort, Gabriel Medeiros Abrahão, Jens Heinke, Nico Bauer, Florian Humpenöder, Hermann Lotze‐Campen, Michael Windisch, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Alexander Popp, Christoph Müller
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Achieving the Paris Agreement's CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction goals heavily relies on enhancing carbon storage and sequestration in forests globally. Yet, the increasing vulnerability of carbon stored in forests to both climate change and human intervention is often neglected in current mitigation strategies. Our study explores modelled interactions between key emission sectors, indicating that accelerated decarbonization could meet climate objectives despite forest carbon losses due to disturbances. However, delaying action on forest carbon loss by just five years consistently doubles the additional mitigation costs and efforts across key sectors, regardless of the assessed forest disturbance rates. Moreover, these myopic responses to forest carbon loss are as stringent, or even more demanding, than immediate responses to twice the forest disturbance rate. Our results underline the urgent need to monitor and safeguard forests for the economic feasibility of the Paris Agreement's climate goals.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
University of Kassel (DE), Leibniz Association (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.