What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms

ABSTRACT Machine Learning (ML) methods are increasingly being used across a variety of fields, and have led to the discovery of intricate relationships between variables. We here apply ML methods to predict and interpret life satisfaction using data from the UK British Cohort Study. We discuss the application of first Penalized Linear Models and then one non‐linear method, Random Forests. We present two key model‐agnostic interpretative tools for the latter method: Permutation Importance and Shapley Values. With a parsimonious set of explanatory variables, neither Penalized Linear Models nor Random Forests produce major improvements over the standard Non‐penalized Linear Model. However, once we consider a richer set of controls these methods do produce a non‐negligible improvement in predictive accuracy. Although marital status, and emotional health continue to be the most‐important predictors of life satisfaction, as in the existing literature, gender becomes insignificant in the non‐linear analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms

Andrew E. Clark, Michela Bia, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Niccolò Gentile et al.
1 citations
Review of Income and Wealth
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
article

What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms

Andrew E. Clark, Michela Bia, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Niccolò Gentile, Conchita D’Ambrosio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Machine Learning (ML) methods are increasingly being used across a variety of fields, and have led to the discovery of intricate relationships between variables. We here apply ML methods to predict and interpret life satisfaction using data from the UK British Cohort Study. We discuss the application of first Penalized Linear Models and then one non‐linear method, Random Forests. We present two key model‐agnostic interpretative tools for the latter method: Permutation Importance and Shapley Values. With a parsimonious set of explanatory variables, neither Penalized Linear Models nor Random Forests produce major improvements over the standard Non‐penalized Linear Model. However, once we consider a richer set of controls these methods do produce a non‐negligible improvement in predictive accuracy. Although marital status, and emotional health continue to be the most‐important predictors of life satisfaction, as in the existing literature, gender becomes insignificant in the non‐linear analysis.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Luxembourg (LU), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU)
Université du Luxembourg, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms — Andrew E. Clark, Michela Bia, et al. · Review of Income and Wealth (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS