Hard and Soft Defense Against a Sequence of Aerial Threats

Tactics to Counter Missile and Drone Threats In “Hard and Soft Defense Against a Sequence of Aerial Threats,” Atkinson and Kress develop an analytical model for missile defense in which a Blue defender counters sequential attacks by Red threats using both hard defense (HD) interceptors and soft measures (SM), such as jamming and decoys. Their model focuses on a shoot-look-shoot tactic by which Blue fires salvos of interceptors and then assesses the battle damage to decide on further engagement. Their objective is to minimize two performance metrics: the number of threats that manage to penetrate the defenses (leakers) and the number of costly interceptors expended. By establishing efficient frontiers in a two-dimensional performance space, they identify effective firing sequences for various scenarios. Their primary contribution is the development of a framework that integrates HD with SM, allowing for an examination of how SM affects interceptor allocation and missile defense tactics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Operations Research
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.1025
Primary Topic
Military Defense Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard and Soft Defense Against a Sequence of Aerial Threats

Moshe Kress, Michael P. Atkinson
Operations Research
Military Defense Systems Analysis
article

Hard and Soft Defense Against a Sequence of Aerial Threats

Moshe Kress, Michael P. Atkinson
article en

Abstract

Tactics to Counter Missile and Drone Threats In “Hard and Soft Defense Against a Sequence of Aerial Threats,” Atkinson and Kress develop an analytical model for missile defense in which a Blue defender counters sequential attacks by Red threats using both hard defense (HD) interceptors and soft measures (SM), such as jamming and decoys. Their model focuses on a shoot-look-shoot tactic by which Blue fires salvos of interceptors and then assesses the battle damage to decide on further engagement. Their objective is to minimize two performance metrics: the number of threats that manage to penetrate the defenses (leakers) and the number of costly interceptors expended. By establishing efficient frontiers in a two-dimensional performance space, they identify effective firing sequences for various scenarios. Their primary contribution is the development of a framework that integrates HD with SM, allowing for an examination of how SM affects interceptor allocation and missile defense tactics.

Operations ResearchVol. 73(4)
Naval Postgraduate School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Military Defense Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.