Democratic Backsliding, Resilience, and Resistance

abstract: This article assesses two next-level questions in the study of democratic backsliding: democratic resilience and political polarization. It first advances a set of methodological decision points to improve clarity in contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding measurement and the possibility of identifying moments of democratic recovery. It then moves to a theoretical and empirical assessment of pathways by which democratic backsliding takes place, under what conditions, which specific actors are involved, and what opportunities exist for democratic recovery given sources of resilience and strategies of resistance. The authors examine the role of political polarization in backsliding and highlight the combined importance of political agency and institutional levers for regime outcomes. The authors argue that regime outcomes are not predetermined by antecedent conditions, and particularly not by the level of development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Politics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2025.a954440
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Social Sciences and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
123.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Backsliding, Resilience, and Resistance

Jennifer McCoy, Paul Friesen, Rachel Beatty Riedl, Kenneth M. Roberts
20 citations
World Politics
Social Sciences and Governance
123.53
article

Democratic Backsliding, Resilience, and Resistance

Jennifer McCoy, Paul Friesen, Rachel Beatty Riedl, Kenneth M. Roberts
article en
20 citations

Abstract

abstract: This article assesses two next-level questions in the study of democratic backsliding: democratic resilience and political polarization. It first advances a set of methodological decision points to improve clarity in contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding measurement and the possibility of identifying moments of democratic recovery. It then moves to a theoretical and empirical assessment of pathways by which democratic backsliding takes place, under what conditions, which specific actors are involved, and what opportunities exist for democratic recovery given sources of resilience and strategies of resistance. The authors examine the role of political polarization in backsliding and highlight the combined importance of political agency and institutional levers for regime outcomes. The authors argue that regime outcomes are not predetermined by antecedent conditions, and particularly not by the level of development.

World PoliticsVol. 77(1S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social Sciences and Governance
123.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.