Efficient blockLASSO for polygenic scores with applications to All of Us and UK Biobank

We develop a "block" LASSO (blockLASSO) approach for training polygenic scores (PGS) and demonstrate its use in All of Us (AoU) and the UK Biobank (UKB). blockLASSO utilizes the approximate block diagonal structure (due to chromosomal partition of the genome) of linkage disequilibrium (LD). The new implementation can be used for exploratory and methods research where repeated PGS training is necessary and expensive. For 11 different phenotypes, in two different biobanks, and across 5 different ancestry groups (African, American, East Asian, European, and South Asian) - we demonstrate that blockLASSO is generally as effective for training PGS as a (global) LASSO. Previous work has shown penalized regression methods produce competitive PGS to alternative approaches. It has been shown that some phenotypes are more/less polygenic than others. Using sparse algorithms, an accurate PGS can be trained for type 1 diabetes (T1D) using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:math> single nucleotide variants (SNVs), but a PGS for body mass index (BMI) would need more than 10k SNVs. blockLASSO produces similar PGS for phenotypes while training with just a fraction of the variants per block. Within AoU (using only genetic information) block PGS for T1D reaches an AUC of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>63</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and for BMI a correlation of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>21</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , whereas a global LASSO approach which finds for T1D an AUC <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>65</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and BMI a correlation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>19</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . This new block approach is more computationally efficient and scalable than naive global machine learning approaches and makes it ideal for exploratory methods investigations based on penalized regression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Genomics
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11505-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient blockLASSO for polygenic scores with applications to All of Us and UK Biobank

Stephen Hsu, Louis Lello, Erik Widén, Timothy G. Raben
1 citations
BMC Genomics
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
1.82
article

Efficient blockLASSO for polygenic scores with applications to All of Us and UK Biobank

Stephen Hsu, Louis Lello, Erik Widén, Timothy G. Raben
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We develop a "block" LASSO (blockLASSO) approach for training polygenic scores (PGS) and demonstrate its use in All of Us (AoU) and the UK Biobank (UKB). blockLASSO utilizes the approximate block diagonal structure (due to chromosomal partition of the genome) of linkage disequilibrium (LD). The new implementation can be used for exploratory and methods research where repeated PGS training is necessary and expensive. For 11 different phenotypes, in two different biobanks, and across 5 different ancestry groups (African, American, East Asian, European, and South Asian) - we demonstrate that blockLASSO is generally as effective for training PGS as a (global) LASSO. Previous work has shown penalized regression methods produce competitive PGS to alternative approaches. It has been shown that some phenotypes are more/less polygenic than others. Using sparse algorithms, an accurate PGS can be trained for type 1 diabetes (T1D) using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:math> single nucleotide variants (SNVs), but a PGS for body mass index (BMI) would need more than 10k SNVs. blockLASSO produces similar PGS for phenotypes while training with just a fraction of the variants per block. Within AoU (using only genetic information) block PGS for T1D reaches an AUC of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>63</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and for BMI a correlation of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>21</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , whereas a global LASSO approach which finds for T1D an AUC <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>65</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and BMI a correlation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msub><mml:mn>19</mml:mn> <mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . This new block approach is more computationally efficient and scalable than naive global machine learning approaches and makes it ideal for exploratory methods investigations based on penalized regression.

BMC GenomicsVol. 26(1)
Genomic Prediction (United States) (US), Michigan State University (US)
Michigan State University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.