Leakage in the common ground: how misalignment in sustainable finance taxonomies impacts cross-border capital flows

There is an urgent need to direct capital toward climate change mitigation in emerging markets. To facilitate cross-border green capital flows, developed countries can endorse the common ground between their taxonomies and those in emerging markets. However, little is understood about the effectiveness of this policy. In response, we analyze how misalignment can occur between taxonomies and construct a micro-economic model to show that four ratios (green bond price ratio, supply elasticity ratio, taxonomy misalignment ratio and preferential treatment ratio) should be considered to ensure that the policy is not counterproductive to climate change mitigation. Numerical examples of the model show that among the capital flows directed from a developed market to endorsed green bonds in an emerging market, as much as 26% can leak to those that fall short of the criteria in the developed market's taxonomy; nevertheless, regulatory intervention can reduce the leakage down to 7%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2025.2481954
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leakage in the common ground: how misalignment in sustainable finance taxonomies impacts cross-border capital flows

Peter Chi Choi Lau, Keith Jin Deng Chan, Lionel Wilson Mok
5 citations
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
8.83
article

Leakage in the common ground: how misalignment in sustainable finance taxonomies impacts cross-border capital flows

Peter Chi Choi Lau, Keith Jin Deng Chan, Lionel Wilson Mok
article en
5 citations

Abstract

There is an urgent need to direct capital toward climate change mitigation in emerging markets. To facilitate cross-border green capital flows, developed countries can endorse the common ground between their taxonomies and those in emerging markets. However, little is understood about the effectiveness of this policy. In response, we analyze how misalignment can occur between taxonomies and construct a micro-economic model to show that four ratios (green bond price ratio, supply elasticity ratio, taxonomy misalignment ratio and preferential treatment ratio) should be considered to ensure that the policy is not counterproductive to climate change mitigation. Numerical examples of the model show that among the capital flows directed from a developed market to endorsed green bonds in an emerging market, as much as 26% can leak to those that fall short of the criteria in the developed market's taxonomy; nevertheless, regulatory intervention can reduce the leakage down to 7%.

Journal of Sustainable Finance & InvestmentVol. 15(3)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
8.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.