“I Was Resilient Before I Knew That Resilience Was a Thing”: Transgender and Nonbinary People’s Perspectives on Resilience

More research is needed on the ways trans and nonbinary (TNB) people are resilient in the face of oppression to develop empowering interventions that mitigate mental health disparities. Much of the research on TNB resilience thus far does not consider how group-level and community-level factors, as well as privilege and oppression, influence resilience. The current study took a community-centered approach by understanding how TNB community members conceptualize resilience and gathering their perceptions of a new framework of TNB resilience, the Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience. The Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience uses a socioecological framework to highlight five dimensions of resilience (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal, and intersectional). We conducted five focus groups with 26 TNB adults (62% BIPOC; 58% nonbinary), ranging in age from 20 to 66 years old ( M = 32.96) and used reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes related to TNB perceptions of resilience. Three themes were generated: (a) resilience is shaped by individual history and context; (b) safeguarding against romanticizing resilience; and (c) yes, and . . . resilience is complicated. These themes showed that the Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience was aligned with community perceptions of resilience. Furthermore, the results emphasized that TNB resilience differs based on context as well as power and privilege. Future research should attend to these nuances in conceptualizing and measuring resilience rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770241308397
Citations
11
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Was Resilient Before I Knew That Resilience Was a Thing”: Transgender and Nonbinary People’s Perspectives on Resilience

Devon Kimball, Kalei Glozier, M. Paz Galupo, Jae A. Puckett et al.
11 citations
Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
26.82
article

“I Was Resilient Before I Knew That Resilience Was a Thing”: Transgender and Nonbinary People’s Perspectives on Resilience

Devon Kimball, Kalei Glozier, M. Paz Galupo, Jae A. Puckett, Zakary A. Clements, Em Matsuno, Mihael MacBeth, Ash Olko
article en
11 citations

Abstract

More research is needed on the ways trans and nonbinary (TNB) people are resilient in the face of oppression to develop empowering interventions that mitigate mental health disparities. Much of the research on TNB resilience thus far does not consider how group-level and community-level factors, as well as privilege and oppression, influence resilience. The current study took a community-centered approach by understanding how TNB community members conceptualize resilience and gathering their perceptions of a new framework of TNB resilience, the Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience. The Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience uses a socioecological framework to highlight five dimensions of resilience (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal, and intersectional). We conducted five focus groups with 26 TNB adults (62% BIPOC; 58% nonbinary), ranging in age from 20 to 66 years old ( M = 32.96) and used reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes related to TNB perceptions of resilience. Three themes were generated: (a) resilience is shaped by individual history and context; (b) safeguarding against romanticizing resilience; and (c) yes, and . . . resilience is complicated. These themes showed that the Multidimensional Framework of TNB Resilience was aligned with community perceptions of resilience. Furthermore, the results emphasized that TNB resilience differs based on context as well as power and privilege. Future research should attend to these nuances in conceptualizing and measuring resilience rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach.

Journal of Prevention and Health PromotionVol. 6(2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Arizona State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
26.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.