Illustrations of Benevolent and Hostile Heterosexism in LGBTQ+ People’s Lives

In this study, we aimed to define heterosexism-a form of sexual stigma that accounts for interpersonal attitudes and institutionalized ideology-in a multi-dimensional way, centering on LGBTQ+ people's experiences. We draw from an ambivalent theory of prejudice and focus on heterosexism, or an ideology that stigmatizes nonheterosexual behaviors, identities, relationships, and communities. We aimed to learn how LGBTQ+ people would narrate their experiences of heterosexism within a benevolent and hostile framing. In a qualitative online study, LGBTQ+ participants (<i>N</i> = 77; 49% White) reviewed definitions of and recalled encounters with benevolent and hostile heterosexism, providing examples of how heterosexism manifests in their lives. In our analysis, we identified themes of benevolent (<i>positive stereotypes, assumptions of heterosexuality, conditional "acceptance"</i>) and hostile heterosexism (<i>verbal and physical violence, invalidation, hostile ideologies</i>). We discuss the utility of an ambivalent prejudice framework for understanding heterosexism that builds from LGBTQ+ people's accounts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2480780
Citations
4
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Illustrations of Benevolent and Hostile Heterosexism in LGBTQ+ People’s Lives

Jes L. Matsick, Mary Kruk, Lindsay Palmer, Flora Oswald et al.
4 citations
Journal of Homosexuality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
9.75
article

Illustrations of Benevolent and Hostile Heterosexism in LGBTQ+ People’s Lives

Jes L. Matsick, Mary Kruk, Lindsay Palmer, Flora Oswald, Kenneth Ye
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to define heterosexism-a form of sexual stigma that accounts for interpersonal attitudes and institutionalized ideology-in a multi-dimensional way, centering on LGBTQ+ people's experiences. We draw from an ambivalent theory of prejudice and focus on heterosexism, or an ideology that stigmatizes nonheterosexual behaviors, identities, relationships, and communities. We aimed to learn how LGBTQ+ people would narrate their experiences of heterosexism within a benevolent and hostile framing. In a qualitative online study, LGBTQ+ participants (<i>N</i> = 77; 49% White) reviewed definitions of and recalled encounters with benevolent and hostile heterosexism, providing examples of how heterosexism manifests in their lives. In our analysis, we identified themes of benevolent (<i>positive stereotypes, assumptions of heterosexuality, conditional "acceptance"</i>) and hostile heterosexism (<i>verbal and physical violence, invalidation, hostile ideologies</i>). We discuss the utility of an ambivalent prejudice framework for understanding heterosexism that builds from LGBTQ+ people's accounts.

Journal of HomosexualityVol. 73(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of South Carolina (US), Arizona State University (US)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Illustrations of Benevolent and Hostile Heterosexism in LGBTQ+ People’s Lives — Jes L. Matsick, Mary Kruk, et al. · Journal of Homosexuality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS