International Journal of Open-access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)

Abstract Aim: This study explored the limitations of the traditional Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework—People, Planet, and Profit—in guiding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and assessed the viability of an expanded model integrating Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy. The research aimed to determine the extent to which the additional three dimensions contribute to the effectiveness and sustainability of CSR initiatives and whether demographic and professional profiles influence perceptions of this expanded framework. The study also sought to identify strategic recommendations to enhance CSR implementation in the Philippine context. Methodology: A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a structured survey administered to 150 respondents involved in CSR activities across diverse industries. The questionnaire captured demographic and professional data, as well as perceptions of the traditional and expanded CSR models. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and ANOVA to determine relationships between variables. Results: The findings revealed widespread agreement on the limitations of the TBL framework, particularly its short-term focus and misalignment with real community needs. Statistically significant and positive correlations were found between the new dimensions—Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy—and CSR effectiveness. No significant differences were observed across respondents’ age, gender, educational background, or CSR role, indicating a universal acceptance of the 6Ps model. Conclusion: The study concluded that the integration of Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy significantly strengthens CSR’s strategic alignment, inclusivity, and impact. It recommends institutionalizing the 6Ps framework in CSR policies, strengthening multi-sector partnerships, enhancing governance structures, and investing in standardized impact assessment tools. These recommendations aim to promote a shift from compliance-based CSR to a transformative, ethical, and community-centered approach to sustainability. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Triple Bottom Line, Partnerships, Policy, Purpose

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Open-access Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63498/nxz2st241
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Journal of Open-access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)

Jay A. Sario, Ericson Z. Matias, Adrian Lawrence Carvajal, Bernardo Bondoc
1 links
International Journal of Open-access Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)
Open Education and E-Learning
article

International Journal of Open-access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)

Jay A. Sario, Ericson Z. Matias, Adrian Lawrence Carvajal, Bernardo Bondoc
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim: This study explored the limitations of the traditional Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework—People, Planet, and Profit—in guiding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and assessed the viability of an expanded model integrating Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy. The research aimed to determine the extent to which the additional three dimensions contribute to the effectiveness and sustainability of CSR initiatives and whether demographic and professional profiles influence perceptions of this expanded framework. The study also sought to identify strategic recommendations to enhance CSR implementation in the Philippine context. Methodology: A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a structured survey administered to 150 respondents involved in CSR activities across diverse industries. The questionnaire captured demographic and professional data, as well as perceptions of the traditional and expanded CSR models. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and ANOVA to determine relationships between variables. Results: The findings revealed widespread agreement on the limitations of the TBL framework, particularly its short-term focus and misalignment with real community needs. Statistically significant and positive correlations were found between the new dimensions—Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy—and CSR effectiveness. No significant differences were observed across respondents’ age, gender, educational background, or CSR role, indicating a universal acceptance of the 6Ps model. Conclusion: The study concluded that the integration of Purpose, Partnerships, and Policy significantly strengthens CSR’s strategic alignment, inclusivity, and impact. It recommends institutionalizing the 6Ps framework in CSR policies, strengthening multi-sector partnerships, enhancing governance structures, and investing in standardized impact assessment tools. These recommendations aim to promote a shift from compliance-based CSR to a transformative, ethical, and community-centered approach to sustainability. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Triple Bottom Line, Partnerships, Policy, Purpose

International Journal of Open-access Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center (iJOINED ETCOR)Vol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.