In search for affect in painful touch

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is often linked to self-injurious behaviors, with many patients experiencing decreased pain sensitivity or analgesia during these episodes. In this work, we have shifted the theoretical standpoint from observing pain to observing tactile pleasure in BPD. Anchoring three linked experiments within the theoretical framework of the Affective Touch and the Social Touch Hypothesis, we studied a group of 28 BPD patients and 28 matched healthy controls. In Experiment 1, subjective pleasantness of CT-optimal tactile stimulations using various textured objects was tested. Results indicated that BPD patients rated rough and painful objects as more pleasant than controls. Experiment 2 examined self-administered touch, revealing that BPD patients preferred rough objects and used significantly greater force (triple) to achieve a pleasant sensation compared to controls, although both groups applied similar CT-optimal velocities. In experiment 3, we analyzed group performances when participants were asked to stimulate others' forearms in a pleasant manner as perceived by the receiver; no group differences in applied force or velocity were found. Overall, our findings suggest that in BPD patients, the perception of tactile pleasure involves the use of painful objects and the application of intense pressure on the skin; however, these features are not used when the patient needs to pleasantly stimulate others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.098
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In search for affect in painful touch

Gianluca Cruciani, Grazia Fernanda Spitoni, Ludovica Zanini, Sergio De Filippis et al.
1 citations
Journal of Affective Disorders
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
1.43
article

In search for affect in painful touch

Gianluca Cruciani, Grazia Fernanda Spitoni, Ludovica Zanini, Sergio De Filippis, Vittorio Lingiardi, Pietro Zingaretti, Marco Iosa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is often linked to self-injurious behaviors, with many patients experiencing decreased pain sensitivity or analgesia during these episodes. In this work, we have shifted the theoretical standpoint from observing pain to observing tactile pleasure in BPD. Anchoring three linked experiments within the theoretical framework of the Affective Touch and the Social Touch Hypothesis, we studied a group of 28 BPD patients and 28 matched healthy controls. In Experiment 1, subjective pleasantness of CT-optimal tactile stimulations using various textured objects was tested. Results indicated that BPD patients rated rough and painful objects as more pleasant than controls. Experiment 2 examined self-administered touch, revealing that BPD patients preferred rough objects and used significantly greater force (triple) to achieve a pleasant sensation compared to controls, although both groups applied similar CT-optimal velocities. In experiment 3, we analyzed group performances when participants were asked to stimulate others' forearms in a pleasant manner as perceived by the receiver; no group differences in applied force or velocity were found. Overall, our findings suggest that in BPD patients, the perception of tactile pleasure involves the use of painful objects and the application of intense pressure on the skin; however, these features are not used when the patient needs to pleasantly stimulate others.

Journal of Affective DisordersVol. 380
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Sapienza Università di Roma
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.