Success and Failure of Blockchain Technology Providers: Founders' Power, Beyond‐Blockchain Exploration and Centralized Decision‐Making

ABSTRACT Despite a growing focus on blockchain adoption within operations and supply chains, these initiatives exhibit an exceedingly high failure rate, with many failing to achieve sustainable success. Why are enterprise blockchain adoptions highly susceptible to failure? In our inductive case study of five technology providers offering blockchain services for operations and supply chains, we examine how founders' power (i.e., expert, prestige, and ownership) shapes management behaviors that build blockchain perceptions and influence stakeholders toward strategic adoption. Our findings reveal that high‐performing cases actively seek inspiration beyond the blockchain ecosystem for service designs and adopt a centralized decision‐making approach where key strategic decisions are made internally. In contrast, low‐performing cases struggle due to within‐blockchain exploration and decentralized decision‐making, leading to slower implementation and limited scalability. Furthermore, we find that founders' behaviors in blockchain adoption are embraced by firm members through performance evaluation and interactions, shaping organizational practices and culture, ultimately determining the success or failure of blockchain technology providers. This study extends previous research at the intersection of founders' power and blockchain literature by developing propositions about how different sources of founders' power lead to distinct management behaviors, influencing the success or failure of blockchain adoption outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Operations Management
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1364
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
61.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Success and Failure of Blockchain Technology Providers: Founders' Power, Beyond‐Blockchain Exploration and Centralized Decision‐Making

Xinjie Xing, Kim Hua Tan, Yuanzhu Zhan, Yu Xiong et al.
19 citations
Journal of Operations Management
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
61.68
article

Success and Failure of Blockchain Technology Providers: Founders' Power, Beyond‐Blockchain Exploration and Centralized Decision‐Making

Xinjie Xing, Kim Hua Tan, Yuanzhu Zhan, Yu Xiong, Andy C.L. Yeung, Fei Ye
article en
19 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite a growing focus on blockchain adoption within operations and supply chains, these initiatives exhibit an exceedingly high failure rate, with many failing to achieve sustainable success. Why are enterprise blockchain adoptions highly susceptible to failure? In our inductive case study of five technology providers offering blockchain services for operations and supply chains, we examine how founders' power (i.e., expert, prestige, and ownership) shapes management behaviors that build blockchain perceptions and influence stakeholders toward strategic adoption. Our findings reveal that high‐performing cases actively seek inspiration beyond the blockchain ecosystem for service designs and adopt a centralized decision‐making approach where key strategic decisions are made internally. In contrast, low‐performing cases struggle due to within‐blockchain exploration and decentralized decision‐making, leading to slower implementation and limited scalability. Furthermore, we find that founders' behaviors in blockchain adoption are embraced by firm members through performance evaluation and interactions, shaping organizational practices and culture, ultimately determining the success or failure of blockchain technology providers. This study extends previous research at the intersection of founders' power and blockchain literature by developing propositions about how different sources of founders' power lead to distinct management behaviors, influencing the success or failure of blockchain adoption outcomes.

Journal of Operations ManagementVol. 71(7)
University of Nottingham (GB), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Surrey (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), South China University of Technology (CN)
British Academy, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
61.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.