Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Abstract Despite the continued global prevalence of discourses of educational inclusion, young people across local, national and international contexts continue to be educated outside of mainstream schools. In England, a diverse market of providers—known as alternative provision (AP)—cater for many of these young people. Unlike the mainstream school sector, where diversity of provision has been positioned as a key facilitator of parental choice and improved standards, there is limited evidence on how diversity and choice operate in the AP sector. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by analysing the range of organisations operating under the auspices of AP and their associated governance and regulatory mechanisms. Document analysis of the approved list of AP in a case study local authority demonstrates a diverse set of organisation types and associated governance arrangements, with a common focus on compliance and a lack of accessible publicly available information. We argue that as a result, the most disadvantaged children and families may be underserved in relation to diversity and choice policy imperatives. We conclude by highlighting potential consequences of poorly understood governance in AP for the achievement of equity goals—consequences which are of relevance across international educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4161
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Andrew Clapham, Jodie Pennacchia, Sheila King, Mark Axler
3 citations
British Educational Research Journal
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
25.57
article

Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Andrew Clapham, Jodie Pennacchia, Sheila King, Mark Axler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the continued global prevalence of discourses of educational inclusion, young people across local, national and international contexts continue to be educated outside of mainstream schools. In England, a diverse market of providers—known as alternative provision (AP)—cater for many of these young people. Unlike the mainstream school sector, where diversity of provision has been positioned as a key facilitator of parental choice and improved standards, there is limited evidence on how diversity and choice operate in the AP sector. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by analysing the range of organisations operating under the auspices of AP and their associated governance and regulatory mechanisms. Document analysis of the approved list of AP in a case study local authority demonstrates a diverse set of organisation types and associated governance arrangements, with a common focus on compliance and a lack of accessible publicly available information. We argue that as a result, the most disadvantaged children and families may be underserved in relation to diversity and choice policy imperatives. We conclude by highlighting potential consequences of poorly understood governance in AP for the achievement of equity goals—consequences which are of relevance across international educational contexts.

British Educational Research JournalVol. 51(4)
University of Derby (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.