To what extent can Artificial Intelligence apply Physics to solve global problems?

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is an emerging technology that creates relevant text, images and other content from prompts. Large Language models (LLMs) are the most widely used of these GenAI forms. This technology already has applications in business and education. This paper tests GenAI’s ability to apply physics to global problems and arrive at viable solutions. When an idea is created by a human, it is merely a culmination of that person’s experiences and prior knowledge, ordered into a new concept. This research proposes that the process should be able to be replicated by a machine learning algorithm and, due to its vast database, a far more informed and coherent idea should be the result. This research tested how well AI could tackle some global challenges and compared the results to how well these same challenges could be addressed by physicists. The data collection process was to have a dynamic conversation with each of the participants and work with them to create a number of ideas and solutions that apply physics to a selection of global issues. This process was repeated with both Bing AI and ChatGPT-4, where they were prompted to return ideas to the same issues. Each of the ideas were then coded to a marking scheme adapted from the ‘OECD DAC criteria for development evaluation’. While Bing AI did not prove itself to be capable of unique idea creation, ChatGPT-4 returned valuable data. ChatGPT-4 excelled at providing efficient, coherent and sustainable results whilst it performed significantly worse than humans in versatility and profitability. The findings show that at the present time, AI cannot work as an idea generation tool on its own due to lacking in accuracy and versatility. It is best applied in tandem with humans where it can be used to generate a series of ideas to a problem and physicists refine the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtns.vi20.4705
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To what extent can Artificial Intelligence apply Physics to solve global problems?

D. A. Davidson, Samantha Pugh
New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

To what extent can Artificial Intelligence apply Physics to solve global problems?

D. A. Davidson, Samantha Pugh
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is an emerging technology that creates relevant text, images and other content from prompts. Large Language models (LLMs) are the most widely used of these GenAI forms. This technology already has applications in business and education. This paper tests GenAI’s ability to apply physics to global problems and arrive at viable solutions. When an idea is created by a human, it is merely a culmination of that person’s experiences and prior knowledge, ordered into a new concept. This research proposes that the process should be able to be replicated by a machine learning algorithm and, due to its vast database, a far more informed and coherent idea should be the result. This research tested how well AI could tackle some global challenges and compared the results to how well these same challenges could be addressed by physicists. The data collection process was to have a dynamic conversation with each of the participants and work with them to create a number of ideas and solutions that apply physics to a selection of global issues. This process was repeated with both Bing AI and ChatGPT-4, where they were prompted to return ideas to the same issues. Each of the ideas were then coded to a marking scheme adapted from the ‘OECD DAC criteria for development evaluation’. While Bing AI did not prove itself to be capable of unique idea creation, ChatGPT-4 returned valuable data. ChatGPT-4 excelled at providing efficient, coherent and sustainable results whilst it performed significantly worse than humans in versatility and profitability. The findings show that at the present time, AI cannot work as an idea generation tool on its own due to lacking in accuracy and versatility. It is best applied in tandem with humans where it can be used to generate a series of ideas to a problem and physicists refine the results.

New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences(20)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.