Neglecting future sporadic volcanic eruptions underestimates climate uncertainty

Abstract Most climate projections represent volcanic eruptions as a prescribed constant forcing based on a historical average, which prevents a full quantification of uncertainties in climate projections. Here we show that the contribution of volcanic forcing uncertainty to the overall uncertainty in global mean surface air temperature projections reaches up to 49% in 2029, and is comparable or greater than that from internal variability throughout the 21st century. Furthermore, compared to a constant volcanic forcing, employing a stochastic volcanic forcing reduces the probability of exceeding 1.5 °C warming above pre-industrial level by at least 5% for high climate mitigation scenario, and enhances the probability of negative decadal temperature trends by up to 8%. Intermediate to high climate mitigation scenarios are particularly sensitive to the choice of future volcanic forcing implementation. We recommend the use of either a stochastic approach or prescribed constant forcing levels that sample volcanic uncertainty in future climate simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02208-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neglecting future sporadic volcanic eruptions underestimates climate uncertainty

Man Mei Chim, Chris Smith, Anja Schmidt, Thomas J. Aubry
3 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate variability and models
3.32
article

Neglecting future sporadic volcanic eruptions underestimates climate uncertainty

Man Mei Chim, Chris Smith, Anja Schmidt, Thomas J. Aubry
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Most climate projections represent volcanic eruptions as a prescribed constant forcing based on a historical average, which prevents a full quantification of uncertainties in climate projections. Here we show that the contribution of volcanic forcing uncertainty to the overall uncertainty in global mean surface air temperature projections reaches up to 49% in 2029, and is comparable or greater than that from internal variability throughout the 21st century. Furthermore, compared to a constant volcanic forcing, employing a stochastic volcanic forcing reduces the probability of exceeding 1.5 °C warming above pre-industrial level by at least 5% for high climate mitigation scenario, and enhances the probability of negative decadal temperature trends by up to 8%. Intermediate to high climate mitigation scenarios are particularly sensitive to the choice of future volcanic forcing implementation. We recommend the use of either a stochastic approach or prescribed constant forcing levels that sample volcanic uncertainty in future climate simulations.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Croucher Foundation, Cambridge Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate variability and models
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.