Suicide and Depression Screening for Gender Diverse Youth in Pediatric Primary Care

Objective: We aimed to compare transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth and cisgender peers regarding universal depression and suicide screening outcomes in primary care and utilization of follow-up healthcare services after screening. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review at two pediatric primary care practices including 782 youth aged 10–18 years who were screened using the Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) and the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). We compared the TGD group to their cisgender peers on demographic factors, screening outcomes, and use of follow-up services, including the emergency department, integrated behavioral health (IBH) contacts, and primary care clinician encounters. Results: Ninety-two (12%) patients were identified as TGD. TGD youth were significantly more likely than their cisgender peers to screen positive for acute and non-acute suicide risk, screen positive for depression, and to receive IBH services regardless of screening outcomes. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization following positive screens, except TGD youth were less likely to see a primary care clinician within one month of positive depression screening. However, this effect was only significant for youth who did not receive an IBH consult at the time of screening. Conclusions: The results indicate that mental health screenings in pediatric primary care are effective for TGD populations, and that IBH at the time of screening may reduce inequities in follow-up care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21694826251319273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suicide and Depression Screening for Gender Diverse Youth in Pediatric Primary Care

Danielle N. Moyer, Naomi M. Wright, Andrew R. Riley, Brianna Wellen et al.
1 citations
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Suicide and Depression Screening for Gender Diverse Youth in Pediatric Primary Care

Danielle N. Moyer, Naomi M. Wright, Andrew R. Riley, Brianna Wellen, Gabriella M. Dover
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth and cisgender peers regarding universal depression and suicide screening outcomes in primary care and utilization of follow-up healthcare services after screening. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review at two pediatric primary care practices including 782 youth aged 10–18 years who were screened using the Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) and the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). We compared the TGD group to their cisgender peers on demographic factors, screening outcomes, and use of follow-up services, including the emergency department, integrated behavioral health (IBH) contacts, and primary care clinician encounters. Results: Ninety-two (12%) patients were identified as TGD. TGD youth were significantly more likely than their cisgender peers to screen positive for acute and non-acute suicide risk, screen positive for depression, and to receive IBH services regardless of screening outcomes. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization following positive screens, except TGD youth were less likely to see a primary care clinician within one month of positive depression screening. However, this effect was only significant for youth who did not receive an IBH consult at the time of screening. Conclusions: The results indicate that mental health screenings in pediatric primary care are effective for TGD populations, and that IBH at the time of screening may reduce inequities in follow-up care.

Clinical Practice in Pediatric PsychologyVol. 13(2)
Texas Christian University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Oregon Health and Science University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.