Development of ROBUST-RCT: Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials

Recent innovations in evidence based medicine methods, in particular instruments assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, have focused on methodological rigour at the expense of simplicity and practicability. Such a focus could lead to challenges in application and loss of reliability of instruments. To deal with these shortcomings, the Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials (ROBUST-RCT) was created—a rigorously developed, simply structured, and user friendly instrument for assessing risk of bias of randomised controlled trials included in systematic reviews. This paper describes the development of ROBUST-RCT and provides associated documents and a manual of instructions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081199
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of ROBUST-RCT: Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials

Carrol L. Gamble, Luz María Letelier S, Paul Glasziou, Matthias Briel et al.
21 citations
BMJ
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
30.77
article

Development of ROBUST-RCT: Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials

Carrol L. Gamble, Luz María Letelier S, Paul Glasziou, Matthias Briel, Gordon Guyatt, Dena Zeraatkar, Elie A. Akl, Sheri A. Keitz, Philippe Ravaud, Kenneth F. Schulz, Dirk Bassler, Reed Siemieniuk, Jane L. Hutton, Susan Armijo‐Olivo, Ying Wang, David Torgerson, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Lise Lotte Gluud
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Recent innovations in evidence based medicine methods, in particular instruments assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, have focused on methodological rigour at the expense of simplicity and practicability. Such a focus could lead to challenges in application and loss of reliability of instruments. To deal with these shortcomings, the Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials (ROBUST-RCT) was created—a rigorously developed, simply structured, and user friendly instrument for assessing risk of bias of randomised controlled trials included in systematic reviews. This paper describes the development of ROBUST-RCT and provides associated documents and a manual of instructions.

BMJVol. 388
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Bond University (AU), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Alberta (CA), Inserm (FR), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), University of Basel (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Université Paris Cité (FR), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), University of Warwick (GB), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE), Impact (CA), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique (FR), University of York (GB), McMaster University (CA), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
30.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.