Accuracy of the AI-Based Smart Scope® Test as a Point-of-Care Screening and Triage Tool Compared to Colposcopy: A Pilot Study

Objectives The primary objective of this study was to compare the screening accuracy of AI assessment with colposcopy. Secondary objectives included comparing the triaging accuracy of AI and colposcopy assessments against histopathology. Methodology This prospective, single-arm screening test assessment study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College in Pune, India. The study included sexually active, nonpregnant women aged 25-65 years visiting the OPD for per-speculum examination. Women with a clinically unhealthy cervix detected during the examination were counseled, and those who provided consent were enrolled. Patients with a history of prior cervical cancer treatment or hysterectomy were excluded. A total of 130 women were enrolled. Each participant underwent colposcopy, Smart Scope<sup>®</sup>-AI (SS-AI) assisted visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine during the same visit. Positive findings from any test led to a biopsy, with samples sent for histopathological analysis. Results Of the 130 women enrolled, 30 were referred for biopsy. Histopathology results were obtained for 18 consenting women. Using colposcopy as the reference standard (N = 130), the accuracy of SS-AI was 76.53%. When compared to histopathology (N = 18) as the gold standard, the accuracy of colposcopy and SS-AI was 63.67% and 83.33%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SS-AI were both 83.33%, while colposcopy had a sensitivity of 83.33% and a specificity of 50%. Likelihood ratios for SS-AI were superior to those of colposcopy. These findings suggest that the SS-AI-assisted test, a digital VIA test, accurately detects positive and negative cervical lesions. Conclusions The SS-AI system demonstrated comparable effectiveness to colposcopy and has the potential to be used as a point-of-care screening and triaging tool in primary healthcare centers lacking colposcopy equipment for triaging purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of the AI-Based Smart Scope® Test as a Point-of-Care Screening and Triage Tool Compared to Colposcopy: A Pilot Study

Prakash Prabhakarrao Doke, Suchita Dabhadkar, Manju Talathi, Varsha Singh
1 citations
Cureus
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Accuracy of the AI-Based Smart Scope® Test as a Point-of-Care Screening and Triage Tool Compared to Colposcopy: A Pilot Study

Prakash Prabhakarrao Doke, Suchita Dabhadkar, Manju Talathi, Varsha Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives The primary objective of this study was to compare the screening accuracy of AI assessment with colposcopy. Secondary objectives included comparing the triaging accuracy of AI and colposcopy assessments against histopathology. Methodology This prospective, single-arm screening test assessment study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College in Pune, India. The study included sexually active, nonpregnant women aged 25-65 years visiting the OPD for per-speculum examination. Women with a clinically unhealthy cervix detected during the examination were counseled, and those who provided consent were enrolled. Patients with a history of prior cervical cancer treatment or hysterectomy were excluded. A total of 130 women were enrolled. Each participant underwent colposcopy, Smart Scope<sup>®</sup>-AI (SS-AI) assisted visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine during the same visit. Positive findings from any test led to a biopsy, with samples sent for histopathological analysis. Results Of the 130 women enrolled, 30 were referred for biopsy. Histopathology results were obtained for 18 consenting women. Using colposcopy as the reference standard (N = 130), the accuracy of SS-AI was 76.53%. When compared to histopathology (N = 18) as the gold standard, the accuracy of colposcopy and SS-AI was 63.67% and 83.33%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SS-AI were both 83.33%, while colposcopy had a sensitivity of 83.33% and a specificity of 50%. Likelihood ratios for SS-AI were superior to those of colposcopy. These findings suggest that the SS-AI-assisted test, a digital VIA test, accurately detects positive and negative cervical lesions. Conclusions The SS-AI system demonstrated comparable effectiveness to colposcopy and has the potential to be used as a point-of-care screening and triaging tool in primary healthcare centers lacking colposcopy equipment for triaging purposes.

CureusVol. 17(3)
Protein Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB), Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.