Standardized Testing And Critical Reading: A Comprehensive Approach To Adventist Educational Innovation

This study explores critical reading competencies in students in the Adventist educational system in Colombia, analyzing both achievements and challenges through a mixed approach. In the introduction, the value of standardized tests to identify areas for improvement in educational processes is argued. However, limitations in its implementation are highlighted, especially in heterogeneous contexts. The methodology combined quantitative analyses, based on the results of the ICFES tests of the last five years, with qualitative data obtained from interviews and focus groups with students and teachers. This design allowed a comprehensive understanding of the factors that affect performance in critical reading. Among the results, advances in levels of literal and inferential comprehension are identified, although significant weaknesses persist in deep critical thinking. Students cited barriers such as lack of reading habits and technological distractions, while teachers highlighted the absence of clear institutional policies and up-to-date teaching materials. The discussion addresses the need for innovative pedagogical strategies, including unqualified drills and the integration of technological tools to improve critical competencies. In the conclusion, the importance of a comprehensive approach that includes teacher training, diversification of texts, and a transversal approach in the curriculum is underlined, in order to strengthen critical reading competencies and their impact on student learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i22s.3651
Primary Topic
Education Practices and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized Testing And Critical Reading: A Comprehensive Approach To Adventist Educational Innovation

Leonardo Alberto Mauris De la Ossa
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Education Practices and Evaluation
article

Standardized Testing And Critical Reading: A Comprehensive Approach To Adventist Educational Innovation

Leonardo Alberto Mauris De la Ossa
article en

Abstract

This study explores critical reading competencies in students in the Adventist educational system in Colombia, analyzing both achievements and challenges through a mixed approach. In the introduction, the value of standardized tests to identify areas for improvement in educational processes is argued. However, limitations in its implementation are highlighted, especially in heterogeneous contexts. The methodology combined quantitative analyses, based on the results of the ICFES tests of the last five years, with qualitative data obtained from interviews and focus groups with students and teachers. This design allowed a comprehensive understanding of the factors that affect performance in critical reading. Among the results, advances in levels of literal and inferential comprehension are identified, although significant weaknesses persist in deep critical thinking. Students cited barriers such as lack of reading habits and technological distractions, while teachers highlighted the absence of clear institutional policies and up-to-date teaching materials. The discussion addresses the need for innovative pedagogical strategies, including unqualified drills and the integration of technological tools to improve critical competencies. In the conclusion, the importance of a comprehensive approach that includes teacher training, diversification of texts, and a transversal approach in the curriculum is underlined, in order to strengthen critical reading competencies and their impact on student learning.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(22s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Education Practices and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.