Supply-Demand risk assessment of urban flood resilience from the perspective of the ecosystem services: A case study in Nanjing, China

• A framework for assessing supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience. • The framework identifies flood-risk levels across different urban areas. • The machine learning method SOM network is employed for subdistrict clustering. • Both the supply and demand of urban flood resilience exhibit marked heterogeneity. • Supply-demand equilibrium spatial structure: central city—subcenter—functional zone. Urban flooding has become a pressing challenge for many countries and regions. Meanwhile, ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction approaches have been recognized as a sustainable and effective strategy for managing flood risks. This study designed a conceptual framework for assessing the supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience (UFR) from the perspective of ecosystem services (ESs). Taking the city of Nanjing, China, as an example, the InVEST model and the multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation method were employed to quantify the supply of UFR provided by natural ecosystems and the demand for UFR from socio-economic systems. Additionally, based on UFR supply–demand evaluation indicators calculated for each subdistrict, the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was used to cluster the subdistricts. Finally, UFR supply–demand matching was conducted on the subdistrict clusters, and different flood-risk levels were identified based on the supply–demand ratio. The results showed that high flood-risk subdistricts are mainly concentrated in central urban area, low flood-risk subdistricts are primarily in urban periphery, and subdistricts in urban–rural transitional zones exhibit medium flood risk. Statistical analysis revealed that this zonal pattern is closely related to land use types and the distribution of social resources. Therefore, this study provides a scientific basis for developing management strategies of urban flood prevention from the perspective of ESs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113397
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supply-Demand risk assessment of urban flood resilience from the perspective of the ecosystem services: A case study in Nanjing, China

Wentong Yang, Xukan Xu, Yiming Li, Peng Zhang et al.
7 citations
Ecological Indicators
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
7.74
article

Supply-Demand risk assessment of urban flood resilience from the perspective of the ecosystem services: A case study in Nanjing, China

Wentong Yang, Xukan Xu, Yiming Li, Peng Zhang, Shengqi Yao
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• A framework for assessing supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience. • The framework identifies flood-risk levels across different urban areas. • The machine learning method SOM network is employed for subdistrict clustering. • Both the supply and demand of urban flood resilience exhibit marked heterogeneity. • Supply-demand equilibrium spatial structure: central city—subcenter—functional zone. Urban flooding has become a pressing challenge for many countries and regions. Meanwhile, ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction approaches have been recognized as a sustainable and effective strategy for managing flood risks. This study designed a conceptual framework for assessing the supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience (UFR) from the perspective of ecosystem services (ESs). Taking the city of Nanjing, China, as an example, the InVEST model and the multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation method were employed to quantify the supply of UFR provided by natural ecosystems and the demand for UFR from socio-economic systems. Additionally, based on UFR supply–demand evaluation indicators calculated for each subdistrict, the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was used to cluster the subdistricts. Finally, UFR supply–demand matching was conducted on the subdistrict clusters, and different flood-risk levels were identified based on the supply–demand ratio. The results showed that high flood-risk subdistricts are mainly concentrated in central urban area, low flood-risk subdistricts are primarily in urban periphery, and subdistricts in urban–rural transitional zones exhibit medium flood risk. Statistical analysis revealed that this zonal pattern is closely related to land use types and the distribution of social resources. Therefore, this study provides a scientific basis for developing management strategies of urban flood prevention from the perspective of ESs.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 173
Hohai University (CN), Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.