A feasibility study of distress screening with psychometric evaluation and referral of cancer patients

To assess for associations of known psychometric scales GAD-7, PHQ-9, pc-PTSD-5 with demographics and clinical characteristics of cancer patients as well as identify their value in screening for distress and in guiding Psycho-Oncology evaluation. This prospective feasibility study employed three psychological testing questionnaires, specifically the GAD-7, PHQ-9, and PC-PTSD-5, for the purpose of distress screening. Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer who scored highly on at least one psychometric scale (defined in previous studies of non-cancer populations as a GAD-7 score of 10 or above, a PHQ-9 score of 10 or above, or a PC-PTSD-5 score of 4 or above) were offered a referral for further assessment in the Psycho-Oncology service and triaged via a semi-structured interview. The relationship between patients' demographics and clinical characteristics and scores and outcomes was evaluated using the chi-square test. Fifty-four patients (30 females) of median age 60 years (range 36-81) were evaluated in the study. Thirty-four patients (63%) scored high on GAD-7, 40 (74%) on PHQ-9, and 8 (15%) on PC-PTSD-5 scales, respectively. Twenty-nine out of the 54 patients who underwent initial assessment with the psychometric scales (53.7%) accepted to be referred to the Psycho-Oncology service and were triaged via semi-structured interview while the rest 25/54 (46.3%) patients declined further assessment. Twenty-two of the patients who were interviewed (76%) required further specialist Psycho-Oncology intervention and the rest were signposted to community services. Patients younger than 65 years of age were more likely to score high according to the GAD-7 tool (p = 0.036). White Caucasian patients tended to score higher in the PHQ-9 questionnaire compared to non-white ones (p = 0.07). Prior history of mental disorder was significantly associated with higher scores in both GAD-7 (p = 0.041) and PC-PTSD-5 tools (p = 0.016). Patients who accepted a referral for psycho-oncology intervention demonstrated statistically elevated levels of anxiety on GAD-7 (p = 0.007) and diminished levels of depression on PHQ-9 (p = 0.042) compared to those who declined the referral. A clinical pathway involving a stepwise approach of psychometric scale evaluation and semi-structured interview can appropriately identify cancer patients with distress requiring further psychological support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94538-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A feasibility study of distress screening with psychometric evaluation and referral of cancer patients

Jacqueline Connell, Daniel Anderson, Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios, Lilly Simpson et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer survivorship and care
3.14
article

A feasibility study of distress screening with psychometric evaluation and referral of cancer patients

Jacqueline Connell, Daniel Anderson, Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios, Lilly Simpson, Niall Fitzpatrick, K. Kamposioras, Susan P. Bruce, Eleftherios Christodoulis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To assess for associations of known psychometric scales GAD-7, PHQ-9, pc-PTSD-5 with demographics and clinical characteristics of cancer patients as well as identify their value in screening for distress and in guiding Psycho-Oncology evaluation. This prospective feasibility study employed three psychological testing questionnaires, specifically the GAD-7, PHQ-9, and PC-PTSD-5, for the purpose of distress screening. Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer who scored highly on at least one psychometric scale (defined in previous studies of non-cancer populations as a GAD-7 score of 10 or above, a PHQ-9 score of 10 or above, or a PC-PTSD-5 score of 4 or above) were offered a referral for further assessment in the Psycho-Oncology service and triaged via a semi-structured interview. The relationship between patients' demographics and clinical characteristics and scores and outcomes was evaluated using the chi-square test. Fifty-four patients (30 females) of median age 60 years (range 36-81) were evaluated in the study. Thirty-four patients (63%) scored high on GAD-7, 40 (74%) on PHQ-9, and 8 (15%) on PC-PTSD-5 scales, respectively. Twenty-nine out of the 54 patients who underwent initial assessment with the psychometric scales (53.7%) accepted to be referred to the Psycho-Oncology service and were triaged via semi-structured interview while the rest 25/54 (46.3%) patients declined further assessment. Twenty-two of the patients who were interviewed (76%) required further specialist Psycho-Oncology intervention and the rest were signposted to community services. Patients younger than 65 years of age were more likely to score high according to the GAD-7 tool (p = 0.036). White Caucasian patients tended to score higher in the PHQ-9 questionnaire compared to non-white ones (p = 0.07). Prior history of mental disorder was significantly associated with higher scores in both GAD-7 (p = 0.041) and PC-PTSD-5 tools (p = 0.016). Patients who accepted a referral for psycho-oncology intervention demonstrated statistically elevated levels of anxiety on GAD-7 (p = 0.007) and diminished levels of depression on PHQ-9 (p = 0.042) compared to those who declined the referral. A clinical pathway involving a stepwise approach of psychometric scale evaluation and semi-structured interview can appropriately identify cancer patients with distress requiring further psychological support.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Cornell University (US), University of Manchester (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Servier
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer survivorship and care
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.