ERP-based evidence for the independent processing of structural and functional action semantics

In this study, the semantic processing and neural mechanisms of manipulative actions, categorized as structural actions and functional actions, were examined to assess whether these action types involve independent cognitive processes. Using a cue-stimulus paradigm with event-related potentials (ERPs), we analyzed neural responses to various manipulative actions. Manipulating the semantic congruency of structural actions (congruent vs. incongruent) and functional action types (wave vs. press) revealed distinct neural patterns. We observed distinct neural differences for functional actions in the 30-44 ms, 144-194 ms, 218-232 ms, 300-400 ms, and 562-576 ms windows. Early activation occurred in the left medial superior frontal gyrus, whereas sustained activity spread from the occipital and parietal regions to frontal regions between 144-194 ms and 300-400 ms. Late activation, occurring in the 562-576 ms window, was localized to the left middle frontal gyrus, right orbital inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior occipital gyrus. For structural actions, neural differences emerged in the 456-470 ms and 610-660 ms windows, which activated the parietal and temporal regions, including the left postcentral gyrus and right middle temporal gyrus. These findings suggest that the semantic processing of structural actions is partially independent of functional action cognition at the neural level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1571972
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ERP-based evidence for the independent processing of structural and functional action semantics

Xuechen Mao, Yanglan Yu, An-Min Li, Shiying Gao et al.
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

ERP-based evidence for the independent processing of structural and functional action semantics

Xuechen Mao, Yanglan Yu, An-Min Li, Shiying Gao, Qin Huang, Xudong Liu
article en

Abstract

In this study, the semantic processing and neural mechanisms of manipulative actions, categorized as structural actions and functional actions, were examined to assess whether these action types involve independent cognitive processes. Using a cue-stimulus paradigm with event-related potentials (ERPs), we analyzed neural responses to various manipulative actions. Manipulating the semantic congruency of structural actions (congruent vs. incongruent) and functional action types (wave vs. press) revealed distinct neural patterns. We observed distinct neural differences for functional actions in the 30-44 ms, 144-194 ms, 218-232 ms, 300-400 ms, and 562-576 ms windows. Early activation occurred in the left medial superior frontal gyrus, whereas sustained activity spread from the occipital and parietal regions to frontal regions between 144-194 ms and 300-400 ms. Late activation, occurring in the 562-576 ms window, was localized to the left middle frontal gyrus, right orbital inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior occipital gyrus. For structural actions, neural differences emerged in the 456-470 ms and 610-660 ms windows, which activated the parietal and temporal regions, including the left postcentral gyrus and right middle temporal gyrus. These findings suggest that the semantic processing of structural actions is partially independent of functional action cognition at the neural level.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 19
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.