Strategic negotiation in construction disputes: overcoming power imbalances and enhancing resolution through structured approaches

Construction disputes are prevalent because of the complexity of projects, heterogeneity of stakeholder interests, and contractual ambiguity. Although negotiation is still the preferred way to resolve these disputes, power inequalities, cognitive distortions, and adversarial behavior tend to undermine equitable and efficient solutions. This research analyzes strategic bargaining techniques by combining behavioral knowledge with formal bargaining models and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) models. It explores the influence of power relationships, psychological considerations, and interest-based negotiations on bargaining outcomes. It also looks at new technology like artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven decision-making for their possible applications in improving negotiations. By using organized approaches, balance of negotiation leverage, and coordination, construction practitioners can maximize the effectiveness of dispute resolution and maintain long-term industry relationships. This research contributes to the development of improved models for negotiation that minimize conflicts and support sustainable project implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1580300
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic negotiation in construction disputes: overcoming power imbalances and enhancing resolution through structured approaches

Omar K. Sabri
Frontiers in Built Environment
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Strategic negotiation in construction disputes: overcoming power imbalances and enhancing resolution through structured approaches

Omar K. Sabri
article en

Abstract

Construction disputes are prevalent because of the complexity of projects, heterogeneity of stakeholder interests, and contractual ambiguity. Although negotiation is still the preferred way to resolve these disputes, power inequalities, cognitive distortions, and adversarial behavior tend to undermine equitable and efficient solutions. This research analyzes strategic bargaining techniques by combining behavioral knowledge with formal bargaining models and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) models. It explores the influence of power relationships, psychological considerations, and interest-based negotiations on bargaining outcomes. It also looks at new technology like artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven decision-making for their possible applications in improving negotiations. By using organized approaches, balance of negotiation leverage, and coordination, construction practitioners can maximize the effectiveness of dispute resolution and maintain long-term industry relationships. This research contributes to the development of improved models for negotiation that minimize conflicts and support sustainable project implementation.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 11
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategic negotiation in construction disputes: overcoming power imbalances and enhancing resolution through structured approaches — Omar K. Sabri · Frontiers in Built Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS