Basic Epistemic Reasons: An Action‐Theoretic Proposal

ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to argue that the foundations of epistemology are grounded in the theory of rational action. Specifically, I will articulate and defend a version of internalist foundationalism based on a distinctive, action‐theoretic version of non‐doxastic justification. The motivating idea is that the justification for our foundational beliefs is inherited from our justification for antecedent doxastic actions, acts of belief formation, or acceptance. These doxastic actions are members of a general class of actions that I call non‐deliberative responses (NDRs). While NDRs are non‐deliberative, I argue that we can make clear sense of the idea that they have both motivating and normative reasons and, consequently, that their performance is normatively evaluable. If this strategy is successful, the justification of our doxastic actions (and, via the inheritance principle, our beliefs) will be subsumed under more general principles of justified action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ratio
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basic Epistemic Reasons: An Action‐Theoretic Proposal

Marc A. Moffett
1 citations
Ratio
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
17.27
article

Basic Epistemic Reasons: An Action‐Theoretic Proposal

Marc A. Moffett
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to argue that the foundations of epistemology are grounded in the theory of rational action. Specifically, I will articulate and defend a version of internalist foundationalism based on a distinctive, action‐theoretic version of non‐doxastic justification. The motivating idea is that the justification for our foundational beliefs is inherited from our justification for antecedent doxastic actions, acts of belief formation, or acceptance. These doxastic actions are members of a general class of actions that I call non‐deliberative responses (NDRs). While NDRs are non‐deliberative, I argue that we can make clear sense of the idea that they have both motivating and normative reasons and, consequently, that their performance is normatively evaluable. If this strategy is successful, the justification of our doxastic actions (and, via the inheritance principle, our beliefs) will be subsumed under more general principles of justified action.

RatioVol. 38(2)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Basic Epistemic Reasons: An Action‐Theoretic Proposal — Marc A. Moffett · Ratio (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS