A ZSENIALITÁS FORRÁSA – LÉTEZIK-E GÉPI „ZSENI”?

The Source of Genius - Is Machine ‘Genius’ Possible?This paper examines whether a machine ‘genius’ can exist alongside human genius by analysing Immanuel Kant’s concept of genius. I explore the origin of genius and what we understand as fine art in the Kantian sense. In this paper, I define how these two concepts are interconnected and whether genius can be learned or produced in the form of machines. Furthermore, I discuss Kant’s view on science and how the process of creating art and science can be comparable and distinguishable, analysing how these two categories affect the shaping of the definition of genius and examining the etymology of the term ‘genius’. Based on Kantian concepts of genius and fine art, I explore why the products of machines cannot be considered fine art and the principles of creating art as a genius. With the help of Plato’s and Schopenhauer’s views, I also examine the source of genius and how these concepts align with the Kantian view. In my paper, I mention the problem of creativity in terms of machines and discuss how machines can simulate these capabilities. As a summary I argue the fundamental differences between the human’s and machine’s sources of knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kultúratudományi Szemle
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15170/ksz.2024.06.03.06
Primary Topic
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ZSENIALITÁS FORRÁSA – LÉTEZIK-E GÉPI „ZSENI”?

Gabriella Manzreitner
Kultúratudományi Szemle
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
article

A ZSENIALITÁS FORRÁSA – LÉTEZIK-E GÉPI „ZSENI”?

Gabriella Manzreitner
article en

Abstract

The Source of Genius - Is Machine ‘Genius’ Possible?This paper examines whether a machine ‘genius’ can exist alongside human genius by analysing Immanuel Kant’s concept of genius. I explore the origin of genius and what we understand as fine art in the Kantian sense. In this paper, I define how these two concepts are interconnected and whether genius can be learned or produced in the form of machines. Furthermore, I discuss Kant’s view on science and how the process of creating art and science can be comparable and distinguishable, analysing how these two categories affect the shaping of the definition of genius and examining the etymology of the term ‘genius’. Based on Kantian concepts of genius and fine art, I explore why the products of machines cannot be considered fine art and the principles of creating art as a genius. With the help of Plato’s and Schopenhauer’s views, I also examine the source of genius and how these concepts align with the Kantian view. In my paper, I mention the problem of creativity in terms of machines and discuss how machines can simulate these capabilities. As a summary I argue the fundamental differences between the human’s and machine’s sources of knowledge.

Kultúratudományi SzemleVol. 6(3)
University of Pecs (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.