Artificial intelligence and copyright: navigating limitations and unlocking challanges.

Artificial Intelligence in creative industries is on rise, and is visibly creating a lot of legal, economic and ethical challenges, mainly related to copyright ownership and infringement. Therefore, traditional copyright laws which provide for the protection of intellectual property rights based on human authorship find it hard to address contents generated by AI. This chapter considers the legal ambiguities of authorship and owning copyright and has several key cases to reflect on, Thaler v. U.S. Copyright Office, and the DABUS controversy. In cases like the United States and the European Union, where such AI cannot be deemed an author but where there is no legal clarification to the contrary, this creates economic uncertainty for industries where AI generated works are used. One more important matter is the risk of violating intellectual property rights during training AI models on copyrighted materials. Concerns have been raised for unauthorized use, derivative creation, and use in ambiguity in fair use over copyrighted works that are often used by AI systems and their large datasets. In addition, the chapter considers legal disputes, e.g., Authors Guild v. To illustrate, I will use the training of AI model by Google Inc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.39671
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and copyright: navigating limitations and unlocking challanges.

Arushi Singh
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Artificial intelligence and copyright: navigating limitations and unlocking challanges.

Arushi Singh
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence in creative industries is on rise, and is visibly creating a lot of legal, economic and ethical challenges, mainly related to copyright ownership and infringement. Therefore, traditional copyright laws which provide for the protection of intellectual property rights based on human authorship find it hard to address contents generated by AI. This chapter considers the legal ambiguities of authorship and owning copyright and has several key cases to reflect on, Thaler v. U.S. Copyright Office, and the DABUS controversy. In cases like the United States and the European Union, where such AI cannot be deemed an author but where there is no legal clarification to the contrary, this creates economic uncertainty for industries where AI generated works are used. One more important matter is the risk of violating intellectual property rights during training AI models on copyrighted materials. Concerns have been raised for unauthorized use, derivative creation, and use in ambiguity in fair use over copyrighted works that are often used by AI systems and their large datasets. In addition, the chapter considers legal disputes, e.g., Authors Guild v. To illustrate, I will use the training of AI model by Google Inc.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.