Quantifying the mixed uncertainty for calculating slope from a gridded digital elevation model

Digital terrain analysis (DTA) using digital elevation models is influenced by two main uncertainties: propagated elevation uncertainty (PEU) from data and truncation error (TE) from the modeling process. Traditional studies often treat these uncertainties separately, neglecting their coupled nature, which limits the ability to accurately capture overall uncertainty and assess the relative contributions of different factors. This study examines slope calculation using evidence theory, addressing representation with focal elements, propagation through belief and likelihood functions, evaluation metrics based on bias and variability, and sensitivity analysis through changes in the probability envelope area. Experiments with Gaussian synthetic surfaces and high-density LiDAR data reveal that PEU dominates overall uncertainty, with data accuracy affecting slope reliability. TE limits users’ expectations regarding uncertainty, with cognitive limitations influencing belief in slope products. This work offers key insights into uncertainty in slope calculation and other DTA models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geocarto International
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2025.2480307
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the mixed uncertainty for calculating slope from a gridded digital elevation model

Shuxue Li, Tong Zhang, Jinlu Zhang, Yi Cheng et al.
1 citations
Geocarto International
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
article

Quantifying the mixed uncertainty for calculating slope from a gridded digital elevation model

Shuxue Li, Tong Zhang, Jinlu Zhang, Yi Cheng, Wen Ge, Qiang He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital terrain analysis (DTA) using digital elevation models is influenced by two main uncertainties: propagated elevation uncertainty (PEU) from data and truncation error (TE) from the modeling process. Traditional studies often treat these uncertainties separately, neglecting their coupled nature, which limits the ability to accurately capture overall uncertainty and assess the relative contributions of different factors. This study examines slope calculation using evidence theory, addressing representation with focal elements, propagation through belief and likelihood functions, evaluation metrics based on bias and variability, and sensitivity analysis through changes in the probability envelope area. Experiments with Gaussian synthetic surfaces and high-density LiDAR data reveal that PEU dominates overall uncertainty, with data accuracy affecting slope reliability. TE limits users’ expectations regarding uncertainty, with cognitive limitations influencing belief in slope products. This work offers key insights into uncertainty in slope calculation and other DTA models.

Geocarto InternationalVol. 40(1)
PLA Information Engineering University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.