Children’s Rights and the “Power” of Power Over

Abstract In this paper, I address the dearth of attention afforded to power theory in children’s rights discourse and growing concerns regarding the scale of children’s rights infringements across the globe. I break new ground in the children’s rights domain by uncoupling power from the “4P framework” and reframing the concept as an analytical tool for practitioners and researchers to utilise in their work with children. I suggest that “power over” according to Steven Lukes’s theory (1974) can highlight the overt and covert reasons underpinning a children’s rights infringement and enhance the recognition and implementation of children’s rights in practice. To demonstrate these functions, I apply Lukes’s thesis to the Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations and present a model for those wishing to implement a “power over” approach to children’s rights in practice and/or in their research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-33010006
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children’s Rights and the “Power” of Power Over

Hannah Hirst
1 links
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Children's Rights and Participation
article

Children’s Rights and the “Power” of Power Over

Hannah Hirst
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I address the dearth of attention afforded to power theory in children’s rights discourse and growing concerns regarding the scale of children’s rights infringements across the globe. I break new ground in the children’s rights domain by uncoupling power from the “4P framework” and reframing the concept as an analytical tool for practitioners and researchers to utilise in their work with children. I suggest that “power over” according to Steven Lukes’s theory (1974) can highlight the overt and covert reasons underpinning a children’s rights infringement and enhance the recognition and implementation of children’s rights in practice. To demonstrate these functions, I apply Lukes’s thesis to the Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations and present a model for those wishing to implement a “power over” approach to children’s rights in practice and/or in their research.

The International Journal of Children s RightsVol. 33(1)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.