Positive Predictive Rate of Breast Imaging-Reporting  and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions For Breast Cancer Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Objective: To determine positive predictive rate of Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 and its sub-categories for breast cancer taking histopathology as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad Pakistan, from Sep to Nov 2020. Methodology: 60 female patients who were diagnosed as Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on mammography were included in the study and afterwards followed for biopsy report. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSSv25. Results: Patient’s mean age was 50.6±9.7yrs. Among sixty patients with BIRADS 4, 13(21.7%) had BIRADS 4A, 22(36.7%) had BIRADS 4B and 25(41.7%) had 4C. Positive predictive value for BIRADS 4 was 68.33%, 4A was 15.3%, 4B was 72.7% and for 4C was 92%. Sensitivity & Specificity of BIRADS 4A being benign and BIRADS 4B, & 4C being malignant is 91.49% and 69.23% respectively. Overall, diagnostic accuracy of BIRADS 4B & 4C classification was found to be 83.33%. Conclusion: Sub-categorization of Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 is not routinely practiced, however results of current study conclude that it helps to stratify the associated risk of malignancy and update the level of concern to referring physician and pathologist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75isuppl-2.5857
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive Predictive Rate of Breast Imaging-Reporting  and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions For Breast Cancer Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Nauman Malik, Ayesha Isani Majeed, Syeda Beenish Zahra
1 citations
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.36
article

Positive Predictive Rate of Breast Imaging-Reporting  and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions For Breast Cancer Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Nauman Malik, Ayesha Isani Majeed, Syeda Beenish Zahra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine positive predictive rate of Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 and its sub-categories for breast cancer taking histopathology as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad Pakistan, from Sep to Nov 2020. Methodology: 60 female patients who were diagnosed as Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on mammography were included in the study and afterwards followed for biopsy report. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSSv25. Results: Patient’s mean age was 50.6±9.7yrs. Among sixty patients with BIRADS 4, 13(21.7%) had BIRADS 4A, 22(36.7%) had BIRADS 4B and 25(41.7%) had 4C. Positive predictive value for BIRADS 4 was 68.33%, 4A was 15.3%, 4B was 72.7% and for 4C was 92%. Sensitivity & Specificity of BIRADS 4A being benign and BIRADS 4B, & 4C being malignant is 91.49% and 69.23% respectively. Overall, diagnostic accuracy of BIRADS 4B & 4C classification was found to be 83.33%. Conclusion: Sub-categorization of Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 is not routinely practiced, however results of current study conclude that it helps to stratify the associated risk of malignancy and update the level of concern to referring physician and pathologist.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 75(SUPPL-2)
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.