China-ASEAN Approaches towards the South China Sea Disputes

The South China Sea (SCS) dispute has been a contentious issue in the Asia-Pacific region, with multiple claimants vying for territorial control and access to its abundant resources. This study examines the ASEAN approach towards the SCS dispute and China's soft power response from 2010 to 2022. The “Soft Power” theory of Joseph Nye has been adopted to analyze the ASEAN approach towards the SCS dispute and China’s response to influence the member states. Moreover, the Qualitative approach has been used for collection of data through primary and secondary data sources. John Scott's model of documentary analysis is used for data analysis. This study explores ASEAN's multilateral diplomacy, consensus-building mechanisms, and conflict resolution frameworks utilized to address the dispute. Additionally, it investigates China's deployment of soft power tools, such as economic investments, cultural exchanges, and diplomatic engagements, aimed at influencing the regional changing dynamics. The research findings shed light on the effectiveness of ASEAN's approach in managing the SCS dispute and evaluate China's soft power response within the context of its regional ambitions. Ultimately, this research offers insights into power dynamics and potential future developments within the SCS region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
journal of social sciences review
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i1.481
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China-ASEAN Approaches towards the South China Sea Disputes

Muhammad Usman Askari, Soniya Ayesh
1 citations
journal of social sciences review
International Maritime Law Issues
2.42
article

China-ASEAN Approaches towards the South China Sea Disputes

Muhammad Usman Askari, Soniya Ayesh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The South China Sea (SCS) dispute has been a contentious issue in the Asia-Pacific region, with multiple claimants vying for territorial control and access to its abundant resources. This study examines the ASEAN approach towards the SCS dispute and China's soft power response from 2010 to 2022. The “Soft Power” theory of Joseph Nye has been adopted to analyze the ASEAN approach towards the SCS dispute and China’s response to influence the member states. Moreover, the Qualitative approach has been used for collection of data through primary and secondary data sources. John Scott's model of documentary analysis is used for data analysis. This study explores ASEAN's multilateral diplomacy, consensus-building mechanisms, and conflict resolution frameworks utilized to address the dispute. Additionally, it investigates China's deployment of soft power tools, such as economic investments, cultural exchanges, and diplomatic engagements, aimed at influencing the regional changing dynamics. The research findings shed light on the effectiveness of ASEAN's approach in managing the SCS dispute and evaluate China's soft power response within the context of its regional ambitions. Ultimately, this research offers insights into power dynamics and potential future developments within the SCS region.

journal of social sciences reviewVol. 5(1)
University of Management and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
International Maritime Law Issues
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China-ASEAN Approaches towards the South China Sea Disputes — Muhammad Usman Askari, Soniya Ayesh · journal of social sciences review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS