EPR Dating of Clay Minerals Formation Through Geological Times: Benchmarking From the Quaternary to the Neoproterozoic Era

Revealing the environment and timing of clay formation in the geosphere is of major importance to understand and model the evolution of geological systems at the surface or near-surface of the continents, such as weathering covers, sedimentary basins or hydrothermal systems. Dating clay minerals by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) is a promising method that relies on the measurement of stable radiation-induced defects (RIDs) accumulating in their structure over time due to natural radioactivity. This approach has not yet been challenged by the inter-comparison with other geochronological methods, mostly because clay minerals accurately dated with methods independent from the EPR approach and also suitable for the EPR dating remain scarce in the geological record. Herein, an up-to-date protocol for the EPR dating and benchmarking are provided and developed by analyzing selected clay samples. The series includes a Mesoproterozoic illite (Thelon Basin, Canada), two paleosol kaolinites (Ukraine, Estonia) from at least late Ediacaran period, an Ypresian sedimentary kaolinite from the Aquitan Basin (France) and two Miocene and Pliocene kaolinites from lateritic duricrusts (Amazonia, Brazil). Despite some discussed uncertainties mainly related to the Th distribution in the samples, the time variation of dose rate and the thermal history of some clay samples, the EPR ages show a trend close to the 1/1 line with ages determined by other dating methods. These results bring promising support to the EPR dating methodology of clay minerals and extend its potential application field over a time-range spanning from Quaternary to Proterozoic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Science
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.130891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clay minerals and soil interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPR Dating of Clay Minerals Formation Through Geological Times: Benchmarking From the Quaternary to the Neoproterozoic Era

Frederico A. Genezini, Etienne Balan, Jan Środoń, Öykü Ataytür et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Science
Clay minerals and soil interactions
0.60
article

EPR Dating of Clay Minerals Formation Through Geological Times: Benchmarking From the Quaternary to the Neoproterozoic Era

Frederico A. Genezini, Etienne Balan, Jan Środoń, Öykü Ataytür, Cécile Gautheron, Elora Bourbon, Thierry Allard, Daniel Beaufort, Andréa Somogyi, Mathieu Chassé, Quentin Bollaert, Christophe Falguères, Benoît Dubacq, Maximilien Mathian, Beatrix Heller, M. Selo, Thomas Riegler, P. Monié, Ramon Messias, Ibtissem Boukais
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Revealing the environment and timing of clay formation in the geosphere is of major importance to understand and model the evolution of geological systems at the surface or near-surface of the continents, such as weathering covers, sedimentary basins or hydrothermal systems. Dating clay minerals by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) is a promising method that relies on the measurement of stable radiation-induced defects (RIDs) accumulating in their structure over time due to natural radioactivity. This approach has not yet been challenged by the inter-comparison with other geochronological methods, mostly because clay minerals accurately dated with methods independent from the EPR approach and also suitable for the EPR dating remain scarce in the geological record. Herein, an up-to-date protocol for the EPR dating and benchmarking are provided and developed by analyzing selected clay samples. The series includes a Mesoproterozoic illite (Thelon Basin, Canada), two paleosol kaolinites (Ukraine, Estonia) from at least late Ediacaran period, an Ypresian sedimentary kaolinite from the Aquitan Basin (France) and two Miocene and Pliocene kaolinites from lateritic duricrusts (Amazonia, Brazil). Despite some discussed uncertainties mainly related to the Th distribution in the samples, the time variation of dose rate and the thermal history of some clay samples, the EPR ages show a trend close to the 1/1 line with ages determined by other dating methods. These results bring promising support to the EPR dating methodology of clay minerals and extend its potential application field over a time-range spanning from Quaternary to Proterozoic.

American Journal of ScienceVol. 325
University of New Caledonia (NC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Synchrotron soleil (FR), Université de Poitiers (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Eramet (France) (FR), Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris (FR), Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (BR), Institut des Sciences de la Terre (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Géosciences Montpellier (FR), Instytut Nauk Geologicznych (PL), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Laboratoire Médiations (FR), Université des Antilles (GP), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), National Nuclear Energy Commission (BR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Clay minerals and soil interactions
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.