Cannibalization of Culture: Generative AI and the Appropriation of Indigenous African Musical Works

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) advancements amplify concerns about the potential to appropriate Indigenous African cultural expressions such as songs, dances, and other forms of art. Generative AI systems autonomously generate diverse content, including music and art, but the supply chain of this new technology presents a complex challenge that may exacerbate cultural appropriation practices. Scholarship on the intersection of technology and Africa’s art and culture is animated by the theme of cultural appropriation and the need for protection against commercial exploitation. Likewise, there is a need for more research on how the unique nature of Indigenous African musical works increases their vulnerability to appropriation in the face of entrenched content digitalization practices and the cannibalization of these works as inputs to, and outputs from, generative AI systems. Therefore, this paper attempts to fill this literature gap by exploring the interplay of generative AI training datasets, Indigenous creative works, and the risk of cultural appropriation, with a particular focus on African music. The author argues that if unaddressed, generative AI systems have the potential to significantly erode the data and proprietary rights of various Indigenous communities in Africa, thereby undermining their ability to derive value from the protection of their intellectual property and sustainability of their cultural identity. Through a doctrinal analysis of extant and emerging policy, legal, and regulatory frameworks, this paper establishes the proprietary nature of Indigenous African music and its vulnerabilities in generative AI’s supply chain. The author makes recommendations that serve as a vital bridge between technology and cultural integrity, offering a pathway for responsible engagement with Indigenous cultural expressions and respectful utilization of Indigenous African musical works for generative AI systems to safeguard against misappropriation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of intellectual property and information technology law
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52907/jipit.v4i1.502
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cannibalization of Culture: Generative AI and the Appropriation of Indigenous African Musical Works

Michael Dugeri
Journal of intellectual property and information technology law
Diverse Musicological Studies
article

Cannibalization of Culture: Generative AI and the Appropriation of Indigenous African Musical Works

Michael Dugeri
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) advancements amplify concerns about the potential to appropriate Indigenous African cultural expressions such as songs, dances, and other forms of art. Generative AI systems autonomously generate diverse content, including music and art, but the supply chain of this new technology presents a complex challenge that may exacerbate cultural appropriation practices. Scholarship on the intersection of technology and Africa’s art and culture is animated by the theme of cultural appropriation and the need for protection against commercial exploitation. Likewise, there is a need for more research on how the unique nature of Indigenous African musical works increases their vulnerability to appropriation in the face of entrenched content digitalization practices and the cannibalization of these works as inputs to, and outputs from, generative AI systems. Therefore, this paper attempts to fill this literature gap by exploring the interplay of generative AI training datasets, Indigenous creative works, and the risk of cultural appropriation, with a particular focus on African music. The author argues that if unaddressed, generative AI systems have the potential to significantly erode the data and proprietary rights of various Indigenous communities in Africa, thereby undermining their ability to derive value from the protection of their intellectual property and sustainability of their cultural identity. Through a doctrinal analysis of extant and emerging policy, legal, and regulatory frameworks, this paper establishes the proprietary nature of Indigenous African music and its vulnerabilities in generative AI’s supply chain. The author makes recommendations that serve as a vital bridge between technology and cultural integrity, offering a pathway for responsible engagement with Indigenous cultural expressions and respectful utilization of Indigenous African musical works for generative AI systems to safeguard against misappropriation.

Journal of intellectual property and information technology lawVol. 4(1)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Diverse Musicological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.