Stimulating (In)equality? The Earnings Penalty in Different-Sex and Female Same-Sex Couples Transitioning to Parenthood in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

The Nordic countries are known as family-friendly welfare states, yet gendered work-care divisions remain. We use a case study approach focusing on the key differences in work-family policy packages in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Using population registers, we compare the earnings trajectories of same- and different-sex couples for the three years before and five years after a first birth. The findings match theoretical arguments linking cash-for-care policies to familialistic outcomes: They show that in Finland, the institutional framework leads to unequal divisions of paid work and care, resulting in large earnings penalties affecting the birth mother in both same-sex and different-sex couples. In egalitarian Denmark and Sweden, but also in supposedly more familialistic Norway, these penalties are considerably smaller for same-sex couples. This exemplifies how inequalities decrease when policies stimulate equality, and as a result can reduce the influence of heterosexual gender dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735884
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stimulating (In)equality? The Earnings Penalty in Different-Sex and Female Same-Sex Couples Transitioning to Parenthood in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

Ylva Moberg, Maaike van der Vleuten, Marie Evertsson
3 citations
American Journal of Sociology
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
article

Stimulating (In)equality? The Earnings Penalty in Different-Sex and Female Same-Sex Couples Transitioning to Parenthood in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

Ylva Moberg, Maaike van der Vleuten, Marie Evertsson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Nordic countries are known as family-friendly welfare states, yet gendered work-care divisions remain. We use a case study approach focusing on the key differences in work-family policy packages in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Using population registers, we compare the earnings trajectories of same- and different-sex couples for the three years before and five years after a first birth. The findings match theoretical arguments linking cash-for-care policies to familialistic outcomes: They show that in Finland, the institutional framework leads to unequal divisions of paid work and care, resulting in large earnings penalties affecting the birth mother in both same-sex and different-sex couples. In egalitarian Denmark and Sweden, but also in supposedly more familialistic Norway, these penalties are considerably smaller for same-sex couples. This exemplifies how inequalities decrease when policies stimulate equality, and as a result can reduce the influence of heterosexual gender dynamics.

American Journal of SociologyVol. 130(6)
Stockholm University (SE), Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.