Comparative Analysis between Conventional Plaster Models and Digital Models in the Accuracy of Prosthetic Adaptation

The comparison between conventional plaster cast models and digital models in the accuracy of prosthetic fitting is a relevant topic in modern dentistry. Several studies have shown that digital models, obtained by intraoral scanning, have advantages in terms of accuracy, processing time, and patient satisfaction over conventional plaster models. While both methods can be effective, digital models offer greater flexibility, allowing for better fitting of prostheses, with fewer impression errors and greater reproducibility. However, it is important to consider the variations that may occur depending on the scanning technique and the region of the dental arch, which can influence the final results. This study aims to analyze the benefits and limitations of each method, in order to offer a clear orientation for dental professionals in choosing the best technique for prosthetic fitting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v8i18.1976
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis between Conventional Plaster Models and Digital Models in the Accuracy of Prosthetic Adaptation

Cesar Daniel Avendaño Belandria
1 citations
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
article

Comparative Analysis between Conventional Plaster Models and Digital Models in the Accuracy of Prosthetic Adaptation

Cesar Daniel Avendaño Belandria
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The comparison between conventional plaster cast models and digital models in the accuracy of prosthetic fitting is a relevant topic in modern dentistry. Several studies have shown that digital models, obtained by intraoral scanning, have advantages in terms of accuracy, processing time, and patient satisfaction over conventional plaster models. While both methods can be effective, digital models offer greater flexibility, allowing for better fitting of prostheses, with fewer impression errors and greater reproducibility. However, it is important to consider the variations that may occur depending on the scanning technique and the region of the dental arch, which can influence the final results. This study aims to analyze the benefits and limitations of each method, in order to offer a clear orientation for dental professionals in choosing the best technique for prosthetic fitting.

Revista JRG de Estudos AcadêmicosVol. 8(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.