Assessing least-cost mitigation methods for environmental phosphorus loading of different pasture-based and housed dairy production systems in Great Britain

Mitigating environmental phosphorus loading (EPL) from dairy farms reduces water pollution and improves the sustainability of production. Studies generally simulate EPL from dairy farms using a representative farm type from existing databases. However, housed and pasture-based dairy farming systems might contribute to eutrophication differently and have a varied feasibility of implementing mitigation. This study is the first that quantified EPL from dairy farms using data for FARMSCOPER collected from farmers and comparing EPL and identifying a least-cost suite of mitigation methods. Structural characteristics of 27 dairy farms in Great Britain (GB) were collected. Annual EPL from each farm was simulated in FARMSCOPER under three scenarios. Mean EPL of the production systems was compared to investigate any relationship between EPL and average 305 day adjusted milk yield of cows on each farm. A least-cost suite of mitigation methods was optimised for two model farms to represent either a housed or pasture-based system. Across both systems, 'current' implementation of mitigation methods was simulated to have reduced EPL from 0.63 to 0.56 kg P/ha (11%). The 'current' EPL positively correlated with milk production on a kg and kg/ha basis (P ≤ 0.001 and P = 0.033, respectively). Farms operating a housed system had a mean 'current' EPL that was 59% greater than the pasture-based system though not significant (P = 0.316). This was partly due to a small sample size and because FARMSCOPER's estimates exclude variations in farm practices (i.e., feeding). EPL was reduced by ~ 50% and ~ 60% without incurring annual financial losses by implementing existing mitigation methods for pasture-based and housed systems, respectively. This study highlights the importance of mitigating EPL from GB dairy farming, especially considering the increasing number of higher yielding herds and housed production systems. Furthermore, emphasis should be on increasing implementation of system-specific mitigating methods; efforts to include more recent and specific farm data to improve the FARMSCOPER tool will benefit this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319919
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing least-cost mitigation methods for environmental phosphorus loading of different pasture-based and housed dairy production systems in Great Britain

Richard Tranter, Brad P. Harrison, C.K. Reynolds, L.A. Sinclair et al.
PLoS ONE
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Assessing least-cost mitigation methods for environmental phosphorus loading of different pasture-based and housed dairy production systems in Great Britain

Richard Tranter, Brad P. Harrison, C.K. Reynolds, L.A. Sinclair, Partha Ray, Martina Dorigo
article en

Abstract

Mitigating environmental phosphorus loading (EPL) from dairy farms reduces water pollution and improves the sustainability of production. Studies generally simulate EPL from dairy farms using a representative farm type from existing databases. However, housed and pasture-based dairy farming systems might contribute to eutrophication differently and have a varied feasibility of implementing mitigation. This study is the first that quantified EPL from dairy farms using data for FARMSCOPER collected from farmers and comparing EPL and identifying a least-cost suite of mitigation methods. Structural characteristics of 27 dairy farms in Great Britain (GB) were collected. Annual EPL from each farm was simulated in FARMSCOPER under three scenarios. Mean EPL of the production systems was compared to investigate any relationship between EPL and average 305 day adjusted milk yield of cows on each farm. A least-cost suite of mitigation methods was optimised for two model farms to represent either a housed or pasture-based system. Across both systems, 'current' implementation of mitigation methods was simulated to have reduced EPL from 0.63 to 0.56 kg P/ha (11%). The 'current' EPL positively correlated with milk production on a kg and kg/ha basis (P ≤ 0.001 and P = 0.033, respectively). Farms operating a housed system had a mean 'current' EPL that was 59% greater than the pasture-based system though not significant (P = 0.316). This was partly due to a small sample size and because FARMSCOPER's estimates exclude variations in farm practices (i.e., feeding). EPL was reduced by ~ 50% and ~ 60% without incurring annual financial losses by implementing existing mitigation methods for pasture-based and housed systems, respectively. This study highlights the importance of mitigating EPL from GB dairy farming, especially considering the increasing number of higher yielding herds and housed production systems. Furthermore, emphasis should be on increasing implementation of system-specific mitigating methods; efforts to include more recent and specific farm data to improve the FARMSCOPER tool will benefit this.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (GB), University of Reading (GB), Harper Adams University (GB)
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.