How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey

This study investigates the operationalization of health equity and associated challenges faced by directors of policy and planning and those in related positions in the African Region. The results of this study demonstrate that health equity is generally a priority for policymakers in practice and is operationalized in four ways: (i) targeting priority groups, (ii) focusing on the entire population; (iii) through procedural justice; and (iv) operationalizing population health data. The targeted approach, which predominated, tended to focus on individuals with lower socioeconomic status, maternal and child health services, and select infectious diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS). The population-wide approach entailed the inclusion of health equity in institutional laws, constitutions, and national policies with efforts to ensure access to health services for all. Procedural justice largely focused on the inclusion of stakeholders in decision-making processes. Lastly, operationalizing population health data was noted to guide policy and planning to address health inequities, often through aiding in the selection of priority groups or areas for intervention and monitoring and evaluation actions focused on improving health equity. Four main domains of challenges for incorporating health equity emerged relating to: (i) understanding health equity, (ii) governance, (iii) resources, and (iv) lack of data. Our recommendations are two-fold: (i) we recommend that researchers focus on improving understandings of health equity among policymakers through knowledge translation and exchange, and (ii) we recommend that policymakers and those working within donor organizations focus on reforming any top-down processes through which priorities are set and decisions are made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004384
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey

Jesse B. Bump, Danielle Jacobson, Emily P. Huang, Michelle Amri et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
article

How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey

Jesse B. Bump, Danielle Jacobson, Emily P. Huang, Michelle Amri, Anna Socha, Daniel Steel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the operationalization of health equity and associated challenges faced by directors of policy and planning and those in related positions in the African Region. The results of this study demonstrate that health equity is generally a priority for policymakers in practice and is operationalized in four ways: (i) targeting priority groups, (ii) focusing on the entire population; (iii) through procedural justice; and (iv) operationalizing population health data. The targeted approach, which predominated, tended to focus on individuals with lower socioeconomic status, maternal and child health services, and select infectious diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS). The population-wide approach entailed the inclusion of health equity in institutional laws, constitutions, and national policies with efforts to ensure access to health services for all. Procedural justice largely focused on the inclusion of stakeholders in decision-making processes. Lastly, operationalizing population health data was noted to guide policy and planning to address health inequities, often through aiding in the selection of priority groups or areas for intervention and monitoring and evaluation actions focused on improving health equity. Four main domains of challenges for incorporating health equity emerged relating to: (i) understanding health equity, (ii) governance, (iii) resources, and (iv) lack of data. Our recommendations are two-fold: (i) we recommend that researchers focus on improving understandings of health equity among policymakers through knowledge translation and exchange, and (ii) we recommend that policymakers and those working within donor organizations focus on reforming any top-down processes through which priorities are set and decisions are made.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(3)
Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Trillium Health Centre (CA), State Archives Basel-Stadt (CH), University of Bergen (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.