Degradation and deforestation increase the sensitivity of the Amazon Forest to climate extremes

Abstract About 40% of the Brazilian Amazon has been deforested or suffered changes in forest structure through degradation (selective logging, fires, and fragmentation). The impact of forest degradation on the forest’s sensitivity to climate extremes has not been fully explored because of a lack of data and the complex interplay of forest structure and climate drivers. Here, we combined forest structure data from 545 airborne lidar transects (375 ha each) across the Brazilian Amazon with the Ecosystem Demography Model (ED2). We explore the forest’s functional response to near-present (1981–2019) climate extremes under observed forest structure from lidar ( Control ) and two forest structure change scenarios: (1) forest recovery by excluding all future deforestation and degradation ( Recovery ) and (2) expansion of selective logging and deforestation ( Degradation ). Using the Control simulation, we found a close and positive association between local forest aboveground biomass and the predicted gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). Moreover, both GPP and ET respond negatively to extremes in vapor pressure deficit and downwelling shortwave irradiance in degraded forests in Eastern and Southern Amazon, indicating high sensitivity to droughts. Locally high-biomass forest patches showed little or no negative response of GPP and ET to extreme drought conditions whereas low-biomass forest patches in the same locations—typically degraded forest canopies—responded negatively to higher moisture stress. The results from the Recovery scenario showed similar results to simulations with observed structure; however, under the Degradation scenario, low-biomass forest patches became more abundant, resulting in more regions where GPP and ET are negatively impacted by hot drought conditions according to the ED2 model. Our results suggest that local forest structure is a critical determinant of an ecosystem’s response to climate variability, and that the loss of canopy trees in the Amazon through forest degradation could increase and expand forest vulnerability to droughts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc58c
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Degradation and deforestation increase the sensitivity of the Amazon Forest to climate extremes

Britaldo Soares‐Filho, Marcos Longo, Eric Bastos Görgens, Ovidiu Csillik et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Forest ecology and management
11.57
article

Degradation and deforestation increase the sensitivity of the Amazon Forest to climate extremes

Britaldo Soares‐Filho, Marcos Longo, Eric Bastos Görgens, Ovidiu Csillik, Mauro Assis, Michael Keller, Xiangtao Xu, Luciane Sato, Sassan Saatchi, Erik J. L. Larson, Jean Pierre Ometto, K. W. Bowman, Ekena Rangel Pinagé, Elsa M. Ordway, António Ferraz, Lara M. Kueppers, Jessica Needham, Liang Xu, Paul M Moorcroft, Francisca R. S. Pereira
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract About 40% of the Brazilian Amazon has been deforested or suffered changes in forest structure through degradation (selective logging, fires, and fragmentation). The impact of forest degradation on the forest’s sensitivity to climate extremes has not been fully explored because of a lack of data and the complex interplay of forest structure and climate drivers. Here, we combined forest structure data from 545 airborne lidar transects (375 ha each) across the Brazilian Amazon with the Ecosystem Demography Model (ED2). We explore the forest’s functional response to near-present (1981–2019) climate extremes under observed forest structure from lidar ( Control ) and two forest structure change scenarios: (1) forest recovery by excluding all future deforestation and degradation ( Recovery ) and (2) expansion of selective logging and deforestation ( Degradation ). Using the Control simulation, we found a close and positive association between local forest aboveground biomass and the predicted gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). Moreover, both GPP and ET respond negatively to extremes in vapor pressure deficit and downwelling shortwave irradiance in degraded forests in Eastern and Southern Amazon, indicating high sensitivity to droughts. Locally high-biomass forest patches showed little or no negative response of GPP and ET to extreme drought conditions whereas low-biomass forest patches in the same locations—typically degraded forest canopies—responded negatively to higher moisture stress. The results from the Recovery scenario showed similar results to simulations with observed structure; however, under the Degradation scenario, low-biomass forest patches became more abundant, resulting in more regions where GPP and ET are negatively impacted by hot drought conditions according to the ED2 model. Our results suggest that local forest structure is a critical determinant of an ecosystem’s response to climate variability, and that the loss of canopy trees in the Amazon through forest degradation could increase and expand forest vulnerability to droughts.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(5)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Harvard University (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Bechtel (United States) (US), Cornell University (US), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), International Institute of Tropical Forestry (PR), Wake Forest University (US), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR), University of California, Berkeley (US)
NASA Headquarters, Biological and Environmental Research, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forest ecology and management
11.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.