Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production

• Solid recovered fuel production is investigated through thorough LCA analysis. • PEF 3.0 method was applied to determine the environmental impacts. • Environmental Footprint (EF 3.0) for SRF production was 2.65 × 10 4 in this study. • Plastics contributed 77.2 % to climate change, the most significant impact. This study provides a comprehensive insight into solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and its potential as a coal supplement in the post-coal region of Moravia-Silesia, Czech Republic. Such studies on waste-to-energy (WtE) applications are often lacking, particularly at critical moments when decisions about regional energy strategies are being made. As a result, viable and less environmentally harmful pathways stand outside consideration. In this study, SRF production is investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA), applying the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology with data from EF 3.0, ELCD and Ecoinvent 3.8. A scenario analysis was also conducted on transport modes and distances. The initial region-oriented scheme of the LCA study included the following steps: separation of waste material, transport to a processing plant, SRF production, and transport to an energy facility. The results present the overall environmental burden associated with SRF production. The most significant impact is observed in “climate change” indicator, accounting for 78 % of the total impact. The primary contributors to the impact are plastics (77.2 %), wood (13.5 %), coal (3.1 %), and transport (2.1 %). The scenario analysis, covering transport distances of 200–400 km, clearly demonstrated that rail transport is a more environmentally friendly option compared to road transport, with minimal sensitivity to variations in distance within the evaluated range. This study uncovers unique insights into alternative SRF production and evaluates its environmental burden through available interpretations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100989
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production

Tadeáš Ochodek, Jakub Čespiva, A. Trusek-Hołownia, Cheng‐Chi Wang et al.
4 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
3.99
article

Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production

Tadeáš Ochodek, Jakub Čespiva, A. Trusek-Hołownia, Cheng‐Chi Wang, Mateusz Jackowski, Daniel Kupka, Jiří Ryšavý, Jenn‐Kun Kuo, Wei‐Hsin Chen, Łukasz Niedźwiecki, Călin-Cristian Cormoş
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Solid recovered fuel production is investigated through thorough LCA analysis. • PEF 3.0 method was applied to determine the environmental impacts. • Environmental Footprint (EF 3.0) for SRF production was 2.65 × 10 4 in this study. • Plastics contributed 77.2 % to climate change, the most significant impact. This study provides a comprehensive insight into solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and its potential as a coal supplement in the post-coal region of Moravia-Silesia, Czech Republic. Such studies on waste-to-energy (WtE) applications are often lacking, particularly at critical moments when decisions about regional energy strategies are being made. As a result, viable and less environmentally harmful pathways stand outside consideration. In this study, SRF production is investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA), applying the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology with data from EF 3.0, ELCD and Ecoinvent 3.8. A scenario analysis was also conducted on transport modes and distances. The initial region-oriented scheme of the LCA study included the following steps: separation of waste material, transport to a processing plant, SRF production, and transport to an energy facility. The results present the overall environmental burden associated with SRF production. The most significant impact is observed in “climate change” indicator, accounting for 78 % of the total impact. The primary contributors to the impact are plastics (77.2 %), wood (13.5 %), coal (3.1 %), and transport (2.1 %). The scenario analysis, covering transport distances of 200–400 km, clearly demonstrated that rail transport is a more environmentally friendly option compared to road transport, with minimal sensitivity to variations in distance within the evaluated range. This study uncovers unique insights into alternative SRF production and evaluates its environmental burden through available interpretations.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 26
Micron (United States) (US), VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Tunghai University (TW), University of Trento (IT), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), National Chin-Yi University of Technology (TW), AGH University of Krakow (PL), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
3.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.