System Identification for Yaw Dynamics Prediction Model of an Autonomous Underwater Glider: Comparison of N4SID and ARX Models Using Preprocessed Data

This paper aims to compare two algorithms of system identification between Auto-Regressive with eXogenous inputs (ARX) and Numerical Subspace State Space System Identification (N4SID). This comparison is based on the development of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) for heading control of an Autonomous Underwater Glider (AUG). The comparison was done by compared best-fit values of those models, made from data through a noise filtering process. The filtering process is using a Maximum Likelihood-based Kalman Filter (ML-based KF). ML is used to get the optimal parameters of Q and R value for K <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$F$</tex>, thus that the optimal value for both parameters can be achieved. Both models have good accuracy performance on best-fit percentage and have low errors. Nevertheless, the ARX model demonstrates a bit advantage over N4SID, achieving the highest best-fit percentage than N4SID model. The ARX achieved the best fit percentage of 71.76<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup> when the na and nb tuned at 6 and 4, respectively with the errors achieved 3.127 for MSE and 1.768 for RMSE. Then the N4SID achieved the best fit percentage of 71.75% at the seventh-order tuning with MSE and RMSE are 3.1586 and 1.7725, respectively. This algorithm will be used as a prediction model for MPC, in future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icadeis65852.2025.10933231
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

System Identification for Yaw Dynamics Prediction Model of an Autonomous Underwater Glider: Comparison of N4SID and ARX Models Using Preprocessed Data

Simon Siregar, Bambang Riyanto Trilaksono, Yansha Ramadhan Pratama, Egi Hidayat et al.
1 citations
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
1.15
article

System Identification for Yaw Dynamics Prediction Model of an Autonomous Underwater Glider: Comparison of N4SID and ARX Models Using Preprocessed Data

Simon Siregar, Bambang Riyanto Trilaksono, Yansha Ramadhan Pratama, Egi Hidayat, Muhammad Hanif Hibatullah, Yansen Dwiputra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper aims to compare two algorithms of system identification between Auto-Regressive with eXogenous inputs (ARX) and Numerical Subspace State Space System Identification (N4SID). This comparison is based on the development of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) for heading control of an Autonomous Underwater Glider (AUG). The comparison was done by compared best-fit values of those models, made from data through a noise filtering process. The filtering process is using a Maximum Likelihood-based Kalman Filter (ML-based KF). ML is used to get the optimal parameters of Q and R value for K <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$F$</tex>, thus that the optimal value for both parameters can be achieved. Both models have good accuracy performance on best-fit percentage and have low errors. Nevertheless, the ARX model demonstrates a bit advantage over N4SID, achieving the highest best-fit percentage than N4SID model. The ARX achieved the best fit percentage of 71.76<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup> when the na and nb tuned at 6 and 4, respectively with the errors achieved 3.127 for MSE and 1.768 for RMSE. Then the N4SID achieved the best fit percentage of 71.75% at the seventh-order tuning with MSE and RMSE are 3.1586 and 1.7725, respectively. This algorithm will be used as a prediction model for MPC, in future.

Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), Telkom University (ID)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.