House of Risk Phase 1: A Tool for Identifying and Prioritizing Software Development Risk Agents

This research explores risk management in software development by applying the House of Risk (HOR) Phase 1 method to pinpoint and rank risk sources. Through interviews with experts in IT, healthcare and government sectors, 30 risk events and 29 risk agents were identified in various phases of the software development life cycle. The HOR model was used to determine each risk agent's Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP), allowing the prioritization of risks based on their relative impact. Significant findings revealed that planning, task prioritization, and awareness of new software implications are critical areas that need urgent attention. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the HOR Phase 1 model in optimizing risk management practices, providing practical guidance to project managers and developers to improve project stability and reduce negative impacts. This research advances software risk management by presenting a systematic method for identifying and addressing top-priority risks, thereby fostering more robust software development processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icadeis65852.2025.10933042
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

House of Risk Phase 1: A Tool for Identifying and Prioritizing Software Development Risk Agents

Paulus Insap Santosa, Ridi Ferdiana, Setya Uswatun Hasanah
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

House of Risk Phase 1: A Tool for Identifying and Prioritizing Software Development Risk Agents

Paulus Insap Santosa, Ridi Ferdiana, Setya Uswatun Hasanah
article en

Abstract

This research explores risk management in software development by applying the House of Risk (HOR) Phase 1 method to pinpoint and rank risk sources. Through interviews with experts in IT, healthcare and government sectors, 30 risk events and 29 risk agents were identified in various phases of the software development life cycle. The HOR model was used to determine each risk agent's Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP), allowing the prioritization of risks based on their relative impact. Significant findings revealed that planning, task prioritization, and awareness of new software implications are critical areas that need urgent attention. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the HOR Phase 1 model in optimizing risk management practices, providing practical guidance to project managers and developers to improve project stability and reduce negative impacts. This research advances software risk management by presenting a systematic method for identifying and addressing top-priority risks, thereby fostering more robust software development processes.

Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

House of Risk Phase 1: A Tool for Identifying and Prioritizing Software Development Risk Agents — Paulus Insap Santosa, Ridi Ferdiana, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS