The effect of an electronic health record choice architecture intervention on efficient diuretic use: A research report

Abstract Introduction Oral metolazone and intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide have comparable diuretic efficacy and safety, although IV chlorothiazide is significantly more expensive. The use of electronic health record (EHR)‐based choice architecture interventions on the efficient use of diuretics remains unexplored. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of an EHR‐based choice architecture intervention on efficient chlorothiazide utilization at two United States institutions and highlight potential annual cost savings. Methods Institution 1 implemented an educational intervention on August 1, 2020, followed by an EHR‐based intervention on January 1, 2021. Institution 2 implemented the EHR intervention alone on March 8, 2023. The EHR intervention prompted clinicians to consider switching to oral metolazone, emphasizing cost differences and similar efficacy. We compared mean weekly administrations and estimated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the use of IV chlorothiazide for pre‐ versus post‐EHR intervention using interrupted time series analyses at each institution. Results At Institution 1, mean weekly IV chlorothiazide administrations decreased from 42.3 ± 21.9 at baseline to 16.4 ± 13.7 post‐EHR intervention ( p < 0.001), with an estimated annual cost savings of $175 000. At Institution 2, mean weekly administrations decreased from 20.3 ± 21.9 to 10.7 ± 5.7 ( p = 0.04), with an estimated annual cost savings of $65 000. Interrupted time series analyses showed a significant reduction in IV chlorothiazide use associated with the EHR intervention (Institution 1: RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33, 0.91; Institution 2: RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.31, 0.65). Conclusion The EHR‐based interventions demonstrated significant reductions in IV chlorothiazide use and potentially substantial cost savings at two separate institutions, highlighting their potential as a scalable strategy to improve efficient diuretic utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70028
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of an electronic health record choice architecture intervention on efficient diuretic use: A research report

Griffin Bullock, Irene Z. Pan, Michael Harms, Nicholas Hendren et al.
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

The effect of an electronic health record choice architecture intervention on efficient diuretic use: A research report

Griffin Bullock, Irene Z. Pan, Michael Harms, Nicholas Hendren, James C. Fang, Spencer J. Carter, Joshua A. Jacobs, Jake Goldstein, Sandeep R. Das, Leah Stinson, Tamara Cisowska, Chris Mathew, Kimberly Terry, Kristin Alvarez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Oral metolazone and intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide have comparable diuretic efficacy and safety, although IV chlorothiazide is significantly more expensive. The use of electronic health record (EHR)‐based choice architecture interventions on the efficient use of diuretics remains unexplored. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of an EHR‐based choice architecture intervention on efficient chlorothiazide utilization at two United States institutions and highlight potential annual cost savings. Methods Institution 1 implemented an educational intervention on August 1, 2020, followed by an EHR‐based intervention on January 1, 2021. Institution 2 implemented the EHR intervention alone on March 8, 2023. The EHR intervention prompted clinicians to consider switching to oral metolazone, emphasizing cost differences and similar efficacy. We compared mean weekly administrations and estimated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the use of IV chlorothiazide for pre‐ versus post‐EHR intervention using interrupted time series analyses at each institution. Results At Institution 1, mean weekly IV chlorothiazide administrations decreased from 42.3 ± 21.9 at baseline to 16.4 ± 13.7 post‐EHR intervention ( p < 0.001), with an estimated annual cost savings of $175 000. At Institution 2, mean weekly administrations decreased from 20.3 ± 21.9 to 10.7 ± 5.7 ( p = 0.04), with an estimated annual cost savings of $65 000. Interrupted time series analyses showed a significant reduction in IV chlorothiazide use associated with the EHR intervention (Institution 1: RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33, 0.91; Institution 2: RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.31, 0.65). Conclusion The EHR‐based interventions demonstrated significant reductions in IV chlorothiazide use and potentially substantial cost savings at two separate institutions, highlighting their potential as a scalable strategy to improve efficient diuretic utilization.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 8(6)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Parkland Health & Hospital System (US), University of Utah (US), Spencer Foundation (US), Utah Department of Health (US), Parkland Center For Clinical Innovation (US), University of Utah Health Care (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.