Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward monitoring vital signs and patient safety. Methods: This descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a university hospital in Turkey. The population of the study was 390 nurses, and it was planned to include at least 206 nurses in the study with power analysis. The study was completed with 218 nurses between June 2020 and May 2021. The data were collected using tools like the Nurse Information Form, V-Scale Instrument, and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire. Results: Nurses’ V-Scale total mean score was 59.51±8.89, and the Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire total mean score was 169.89±27.46 in this study. A positive, low-level significant correlation existed between the nurses’ V-Scale and SAQ total scores (r=0.248, p<0.001). According to the results of linear regression analysis, receiving patient safety training in the current year and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire “safety climate” and “stress recognition” sub-dimension scores significantly affected V-Scale total scores (p=0.022, p=0.032, p=0.002, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, nurses’ vital signs monitoring and patient safety attitudes were above average, and there was a statistically significant correlation between these attitude scores. Keywords: Nursing assessment, patient monitoring, patient safety, vital signs

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1405925
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study

Aysel Özsaban, Nuray Turan, Türkinaz Aştı, Yasemin Kıyak et al.
Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study

Aysel Özsaban, Nuray Turan, Türkinaz Aştı, Yasemin Kıyak, Ayşen Karabacak, Gizem Öner, Gözde Ataş
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward monitoring vital signs and patient safety. Methods: This descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a university hospital in Turkey. The population of the study was 390 nurses, and it was planned to include at least 206 nurses in the study with power analysis. The study was completed with 218 nurses between June 2020 and May 2021. The data were collected using tools like the Nurse Information Form, V-Scale Instrument, and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire. Results: Nurses’ V-Scale total mean score was 59.51±8.89, and the Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire total mean score was 169.89±27.46 in this study. A positive, low-level significant correlation existed between the nurses’ V-Scale and SAQ total scores (r=0.248, p<0.001). According to the results of linear regression analysis, receiving patient safety training in the current year and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire “safety climate” and “stress recognition” sub-dimension scores significantly affected V-Scale total scores (p=0.022, p=0.032, p=0.002, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, nurses’ vital signs monitoring and patient safety attitudes were above average, and there was a statistically significant correlation between these attitude scores. Keywords: Nursing assessment, patient monitoring, patient safety, vital signs

Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları DergisiVol. 8(1)
Karadeniz Technical University (TR), Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.